LWN: Comments on "Announcing the release of Fedora 14 Beta" https://lwn.net/Articles/407454/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Announcing the release of Fedora 14 Beta". en-us Mon, 22 Sep 2025 18:38:08 +0000 Mon, 22 Sep 2025 18:38:08 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Announcing the release of Fedora 14 Beta https://lwn.net/Articles/413194/ https://lwn.net/Articles/413194/ oranda <div class="FormattedComment"> Vmware fusion - Go into your VMWare Device Profile and remove the second CDROM device that has "Using autoinst.iso".<br> <p> This was passed onto me from klank-rno at linuxquestions.org<br> <p> worked for me :-)<br> </div> Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:24:20 +0000 Announcing the release of Fedora 14 Beta https://lwn.net/Articles/413008/ https://lwn.net/Articles/413008/ oranda <div class="FormattedComment"> I'm getting the same with vmware fusion. I reported it on bugzilla and was told it was a known problem with vmware.<br> <p> If there is a solution I'd love to know too.<br> As Fedora 14 is only a day and some hours old, I suppose I shouldn't be too impatient.<br> </div> Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:32:55 +0000 Announcing the release of Fedora 14 Beta https://lwn.net/Articles/411697/ https://lwn.net/Articles/411697/ phx <div class="FormattedComment"> I met the same problem, how to fix this? I'm waiting for the answer,thanks.<br> </div> Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:52:12 +0000 A common man's Wireless Card https://lwn.net/Articles/410060/ https://lwn.net/Articles/410060/ ebiederm <div class="FormattedComment"> Does this work in 2.6.32? 2.6.36?<br> <p> I can't tell from your comments if there is a regression in the driver<br> or if fedora just happens to include a problematic patch.<br> <p> From the sounds of it, someone did something that caused the driver to regresss in more recent kernels and that just hasn't been addressed yet.<br> <p> <p> </div> Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:17:10 +0000 A common man's Wireless Card https://lwn.net/Articles/408022/ https://lwn.net/Articles/408022/ mpr22 <blockquote>If i can make it Work, Why Fedora Cannot?</blockquote> <p>Distribution maintainers are human, and therefore sometimes make mistakes. Did you file a bug report?</p> Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:48:14 +0000 Announcing the release of Fedora 14 Beta https://lwn.net/Articles/407919/ https://lwn.net/Articles/407919/ vonbrand <p> Don't worry, I've commited such fatfingering too. Plus my full share of random brainos ;-) <p> Thanks for making Fedora (and Linux) better! Fri, 01 Oct 2010 02:54:22 +0000 A common man's Wireless Card https://lwn.net/Articles/407797/ https://lwn.net/Articles/407797/ carlitos.esquer <div class="FormattedComment"> It's a TP-LINK WN651G, and i told you before, this card works vey fine in Ubuntu, Debian an My Own Linux based on Linux From Scratch (6.3 a very old one) I use a vanilla Kernel 2.6.28 that i compiled myself...<br> If i can make it Work, Why Fedora Cannot?<br> <p> About ReiserFS (Version 3.6), it is fast and very reliable until now (Two years after)... Never mind fscks, never mind monthly checks and all that Ext3, Ext4 stuff i hate.<br> </div> Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:54:20 +0000 Stop that trend (releasing, releasing, releasing) https://lwn.net/Articles/407725/ https://lwn.net/Articles/407725/ rahulsundaram <div class="FormattedComment"> Although I can't advocate using it, Fedora does actually have the ability to use reiserfs during installation time. At installation boot prompt, type linux selinux=0 reiserfs. You get whatever upstream provides. No explicit testing or support. <br> </div> Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:53:27 +0000 Stop that trend (releasing, releasing, releasing) https://lwn.net/Articles/407715/ https://lwn.net/Articles/407715/ mpr22 <p>Fedora is not Debian stable, or CentOS... and this is a good thing, because those things are already available.</p> <p>(As for ReiserFS... after hearing someone's horror story about what happened when they fsck'd a ReiserFS volume that held a file containing a ReiserFS filesystem image, I promised myself I would never use it.)</p> Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:35:43 +0000 Stop that trend (releasing, releasing, releasing) https://lwn.net/Articles/407645/ https://lwn.net/Articles/407645/ luya <div class="FormattedComment"> Please, there are enough people here who want to try latest technologies instead of living into inertia.<br> <p> You post about wireless card without mentioning its name so readers will be see what you are talking about. It could be an obscure version very few heard.<br> <p> ReiserFS is not officially supported by Fedora Project due to its inability to use SELinux as required. You can use it at the installer prompt:<br> <p> linux selinux=0 reiserfs<br> <p> Be in mind you will be on your own. The last thing a project wants to do is to expose users to unsupported partition.<br> <p> <p> </div> Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:53:29 +0000 Stop that trend (releasing, releasing, releasing) https://lwn.net/Articles/407605/ https://lwn.net/Articles/407605/ carlitos.esquer <div class="FormattedComment"> I think that Fedora Community must stop this releasing trend wich only affects Linux.<br> Consider this, i tried to install from Fedora 11 to Fedora 13 in my computer but never get my Wireless card functioning. Nevertheless, if i use my own compiled LFS based Linux i can use all the hardware my computers (3 different ones) have.<br> The default ath5k driver damages for a few minutes my wireless card (ok, maybe a kernel problem but i use 2.6.28 with no problem), making it unusable for 5 or 10 minutes after. I turn off my computer, wait for some minutes and then i can get online in a hurry. No problems with wicd, no problems with pass keys, NO problems at all.<br> Besides, every time i tried to install Fedora, i cannot get my ReiserFS file systems up, my question is why they not include ReiserFS, Ubuntu does, Debian does, even Mandriva does.<br> <p> That's my story, i'm sorry<br> </div> Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:43:07 +0000 Announcing the release of Fedora 14 Beta https://lwn.net/Articles/407498/ https://lwn.net/Articles/407498/ parimi <div class="FormattedComment"> I just realized it was user-error :( I was booting off a different iso image. Serves me right for trying to do some beta testing<br> </div> Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:36:49 +0000 Announcing the release of Fedora 14 Beta https://lwn.net/Articles/407492/ https://lwn.net/Articles/407492/ vonbrand <p> Did you report this at <a href="http://bugzilla.redhat.com">Bugzilla</a>, as requested? Creating an account there is easy... Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:28:49 +0000 Announcing the release of Fedora 14 Beta https://lwn.net/Articles/407482/ https://lwn.net/Articles/407482/ parimi <div class="FormattedComment"> Tried installing beta from iso using vmware workstation, but ran into error even before installer started:<br> <p> ---------<br> <p> The following problem occurred on line 65 of the kickstart file:<br> <p> Section does not end with %%end.<br> <p> install exited abnormally [1/1]<br> <p> -----------<br> </div> Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:33:57 +0000