LWN: Comments on "Thwarting internet censors with Collage" https://lwn.net/Articles/403193/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Thwarting internet censors with Collage". en-us Sat, 04 Oct 2025 16:58:40 +0000 Sat, 04 Oct 2025 16:58:40 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Interesting but limited in use https://lwn.net/Articles/404179/ https://lwn.net/Articles/404179/ renox <div class="FormattedComment"> IHMO the main weakness of steganography is that it's (currently) restricted to man to man communications i.e you cannot browse a website with Collage.<br> <p> Sure you can in theory ask someone to download a webpage for you and send you the result hidden using Collage also, but this doesn't seem very practical for 'day to day' usage.<br> It would be interesting to automate this..<br> <p> <p> <p> <p> <p> </div> Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:46:56 +0000 Thwarting internet censors with Collage https://lwn.net/Articles/403641/ https://lwn.net/Articles/403641/ ortalo <div class="FormattedComment"> What about using covert channels instead of steganography to evade such censorship? I wonder which technique is more vulnerable to detection (both have been well studied in the litterature).<br> <p> To illustrate the covert channel idea: if a black and white picture is stored, this a "0", if that's a colour picture, then it's a "1".<br> Of course, practical implementations should try to improve the bandwitdh, possibly with more image types or other types of shared resources: for example (landscape, portrait, fish, animal) mapping to (00,01,10,11).<br> <p> <p> <p> </div> Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:24:11 +0000