LWN: Comments on "VirtualBox 3.2 released" https://lwn.net/Articles/388248/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "VirtualBox 3.2 released". en-us Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:59:46 +0000 Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:59:46 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net VirtualBox 3.2 released https://lwn.net/Articles/388416/ https://lwn.net/Articles/388416/ pabs <div class="FormattedComment"> Still no USB support in the GPL edition :(<br> </div> Thu, 20 May 2010 02:31:24 +0000 VirtualBox 3.2 released https://lwn.net/Articles/388274/ https://lwn.net/Articles/388274/ Janne <div class="FormattedComment"> Which is why you could use Virtualbox in a Mac to run virtualized MacOS. <br> </div> Wed, 19 May 2010 16:19:49 +0000 VirtualBox 3.2 released https://lwn.net/Articles/388272/ https://lwn.net/Articles/388272/ yokem_55 <div class="FormattedComment"> Fortunately Mac hardware can run windows and Linux. So, if for some reason you want to, you can run MacOSX in VirtualBox on your shiny Mac Hardware while it is running another operating system, without violating the letter of the EULA. How long this will fly given the obvious problem of non-mac hardware running VirtualBox running OSX I don't know. But it will work for now. <br> </div> Wed, 19 May 2010 16:18:37 +0000 VirtualBox 3.2 released https://lwn.net/Articles/388265/ https://lwn.net/Articles/388265/ rahvin <div class="FormattedComment"> They didn't enable hardware hacks, without approved mac hardware it won't run, it's in the release notes. <br> </div> Wed, 19 May 2010 16:00:12 +0000 VirtualBox 3.2 released https://lwn.net/Articles/388261/ https://lwn.net/Articles/388261/ zeekec And when has that stopped people... Wed, 19 May 2010 15:42:10 +0000 VirtualBox 3.2 released https://lwn.net/Articles/388259/ https://lwn.net/Articles/388259/ xnox <div class="FormattedComment"> I thought Mac OS X EULA prohibited running Mac OS X in VM or non-apple branded hardware?<br> </div> Wed, 19 May 2010 15:35:54 +0000 VirtualBox 3.2 released https://lwn.net/Articles/388254/ https://lwn.net/Articles/388254/ cesarb <div class="FormattedComment"> As I read it, it is not that it is "now owned by Oracle", but that it has _changed its name_ (granted, what has changed seems to be only a longer version of the name which nobody actually seems to use).<br> <p> A project changing its name sure merits being the first item on the changelog. It is something you do not want people to miss (putting it in the middle or near the end of the changelog risks people getting bored before getting to that line and skipping it without noticing).<br> </div> Wed, 19 May 2010 15:02:20 +0000 VirtualBox 3.2 released https://lwn.net/Articles/388251/ https://lwn.net/Articles/388251/ clugstj <div class="FormattedComment"> The most important new feature (the first one listed) is that it is now owned by Oracle?<br> </div> Wed, 19 May 2010 14:50:02 +0000