LWN: Comments on "Barriers to London's open source adoption" https://lwn.net/Articles/384863/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Barriers to London's open source adoption". en-us Fri, 05 Sep 2025 09:11:08 +0000 Fri, 05 Sep 2025 09:11:08 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net GLA linked into TfL's systems https://lwn.net/Articles/386713/ https://lwn.net/Articles/386713/ pukunui <div class="FormattedComment"> Seems like this is a business-critical link, so I hope there's more than "a dedicated fibre-optic cable running between the two buildings".<br> <p> I've no idea of the relevant geography, but please tell me there's at least two reasonably diverse links?<br> </div> Fri, 07 May 2010 02:11:44 +0000 Barriers to London's open source adoption https://lwn.net/Articles/385798/ https://lwn.net/Articles/385798/ pjdowner <div class="FormattedComment"> Thanks for this article, as someone who lives in London it's great to read about open source adoption in the GLA.<br> </div> Sun, 02 May 2010 12:59:29 +0000 Barriers to London's open source adoption https://lwn.net/Articles/385261/ https://lwn.net/Articles/385261/ frazier Looking at the PDF regarding having an open source CMS in 2006 was very interesting. <blockquote><i>By 2009 open source technology and the inherent benefits were a credible and viable option. That was not the case in 2006 when the GLA received only one proposal to build on an open-source CMS out of hundreds.</i></blockquote> It's not hard to believe that Plone in that era was a better system overall than the one they signed up for (see the timeline in the PDF... ...oh my!). The failure was they were looking for software plus professional services as a package and probably put out a request for proposals. Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:40:39 +0000