LWN: Comments on "New GNOME Journal articles" https://lwn.net/Articles/373327/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "New GNOME Journal articles". en-us Fri, 07 Nov 2025 06:42:31 +0000 Fri, 07 Nov 2025 06:42:31 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net OpenShot package https://lwn.net/Articles/374034/ https://lwn.net/Articles/374034/ bronson <div class="FormattedComment"> I couldn't find any PPAs so I used the OpenShot build wizard. It worked great -- fire and forget.<br> <p> <a href="http://www.openshotvideo.com/2009/05/openshot-build-wizard-its-magic.html">http://www.openshotvideo.com/2009/05/openshot-build-wizar...</a><br> <p> It does expose a gstreamer bug though. After the wizard installs frei0r you won't be able to run Totem/Rhythmbox/etc. To get around this I just dual-booted. Here's more on that:<br> <p> <a href="http://openshotusers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&amp;t=4&amp;p=471&amp;hilit=bronson#p471">http://openshotusers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&amp;t=4...</a><br> <p> Of course, this should be all sorted out for Lucid.<br> <p> </div> Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:01:54 +0000 OpenShot package https://lwn.net/Articles/373995/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373995/ sumanah <div class="FormattedComment"> Surely there's a PPA that would be easier than compiling from source?<br> </div> Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:41:01 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373418/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373418/ drag <div class="FormattedComment"> alright.<br> <p> Remember that all of this is from 2004-2005 and that was a long long time ago <br> in the internet era. People are not good at preserving their blogs and other <br> things that would help document what I was saying.<br> <p> The best I can do right now is:<br> <a href="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2005/Dec-24.html">http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2005/Dec-24.html</a><br> <p> And a Rhythmbox developer thread on their mailing list talking about doing a <br> relicensing. (which has happened, apparently,)<br> <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/rhythmbox-devel@gnome.org/msg01981.html">http://www.mail-archive.com/rhythmbox-devel@gnome.org/msg...</a><br> </div> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:22:11 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373414/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373414/ Frej <div class="FormattedComment"> I would like if you could actually provid a quote from some of the banshee authors.... What you write <br> is just unsubstantiated... and the licensing is not a problem today.<br> <p> </div> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:13:16 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373411/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373411/ hadess <div class="FormattedComment"> Actually, Banshee exists because even GPL + exception for GStreamer plugins wouldn't have <br> allowed SUSE to ship it with a Helix backend (which they did to get MP3 playback and encoders <br> from Real). That, and possibly showing that Mono is a viable platform...<br> </div> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:50:57 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373401/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373401/ drag <div class="FormattedComment"> Gstreamer is LGPL which is designed to allow this sort of usage. <br> <p> I figure that in order to be safe from stepping on anybody's toes it is <br> important to be able to satisfy the licensing of all software that you have <br> shipping as a single product. <br> <p> A plugin mechanism provides some level of abstraction, but I guess it is not <br> enough to prevent creating a derivative product by combining two otherwise <br> separate pieces of software. "Derivative" as used by a legal term to indicate <br> were your responsibilities for copyrights end and begin.<br> <p> This sort of thing is why we have lawyers, I suppose.<br> </div> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:58:01 +0000 New GNOME Journal articles https://lwn.net/Articles/373402/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373402/ bronson <div class="FormattedComment"> OpenShot is a great program. The version of MLT that comes with Karmic is too old (not frame-accurate) so you need to manually compile the latest. Once you do that, it's smooth sailing.<br> <p> Rich and intuitive UI, great features, quick results. It will be a winner if it makes it into Lucid.<br> <p> </div> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:57:13 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373396/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373396/ zlynx <div class="FormattedComment"> How does that apply when both Rhythmbox and Banshee use GStreamer to play media?<br> <p> It seems to me it would be a problem with the GStreamer license if any.<br> </div> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:42:03 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373394/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373394/ rahulsundaram <div class="FormattedComment"> I never claimed you said that but it is important to point out that the <br> reason is not valid anymore and the effort require to license was much less <br> than the effort require to create another from scratch <br> </div> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:59:50 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373393/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373393/ drag <div class="FormattedComment"> Who said it was a disadvantage still?<br> I was just stating one of the reasons why Banshee was created by the Novell <br> folks, originally. <br> <p> I am sure there are other resaons, too. Banshee is not the only media player <br> to be created since Rhythmbox was created. Exaile, for example.<br> </div> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:38:44 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373389/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373389/ rahulsundaram <div class="FormattedComment"> Sure but it is way past time for licensing to be considered a disadvantage <br> for Rhythmbox<br> </div> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:09:53 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373385/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373385/ jku <div class="FormattedComment"> That exception wasn't always there, the relicensing happened maybe two years ago.<br> </div> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:53:10 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373367/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373367/ rahulsundaram <div class="FormattedComment"> Rhythmbox is not plain GPL but GPL with exceptions specifically to avoid <br> this problem as seen in the footer of<br> <p> <a href="http://projects.gnome.org/rhythmbox/">http://projects.gnome.org/rhythmbox/</a><br> <p> <p> </div> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:48:12 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373361/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373361/ drag Rhythmbox is licensed GPL. <br><br> The codecs are copyright licensed MIT, but have additional restrictions placed on them due to the patent license... meaning it is legal for you to play around with the code, but you may not redistribute it. The only legal sources for these codecs is either bundled via Novell or a no-cost download from Fluendo. <br><br> This sort of additional restriction on redistribution is expressly forbidden by the GPL. Meanwhile Banshee, like the codecs, are licensed under MIT and thus do not have the requirements to maintain freedoms for end users. <br><br> I think that this is the core of the issue. <br><br> If I find a historical link to this then I'll post it. I'm going from memory right now. <br><br> There may have been a desire later on to support some sort of DRM, but since DRM is effectively dead now when it comes to music then that part of things is mostly a non-issue. Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:42:25 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373360/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373360/ rahulsundaram <div class="FormattedComment"> What exactly is the licensing issue? Can you provide a reference?<br> </div> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:28:43 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373359/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373359/ drag Licensing. <br><br> Rhythmbox licensing made it difficult to ship legal open source mp3 codecs bundled. That is codecs that are open source and had their patent licensing paid for. (the Fluendo MIT licensed codecs) So companies that desired to ship legal mp3 playback couldn't really use Rhythmbox. Banshee seems to me to be a improvement over what was previously used, which was the open source version of RealPlayer (which for the type of application it is is quite nice), which couldn't use the Fluendo/Gstreamer stuff anyways. <br><br> That and probably a desire to prove that Mono can be used to make viable Gnome applications. Back when it was started Mono was very new and you generally need some applications developed in order to test out the new framework in practical environment. And for promotional purposes. Banshee is actually quite nice. <br><br> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:24:06 +0000 Banshee and Mono https://lwn.net/Articles/373339/ https://lwn.net/Articles/373339/ eparis123 <p>Sometimes I felt that Banshee (and a filesystem indexing program I don't remember its name) was a trojan horse to initially inject Monoin the Gnome platform.</p> <p>I don't know why Rhythmbox wasn't extended instead, but maybe there were valid technical reasons.</p> Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:19:45 +0000