LWN: Comments on "The end of user-space mode setting?" https://lwn.net/Articles/369706/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "The end of user-space mode setting?". en-us Tue, 04 Nov 2025 14:01:03 +0000 Tue, 04 Nov 2025 14:01:03 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/371546/ https://lwn.net/Articles/371546/ nix <div class="FormattedComment"> Certainly on newer cards, yes. But, again, if you have a new card, you <br> probably have a new machine as well, and it's quite likely you *need* a <br> new kernel anyway. (And if you're changing the graphics card in an <br> existing machine, you can be assumed to be some variety of geek and thus <br> capable of building one.)<br> <p> </div> Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:16:34 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/371180/ https://lwn.net/Articles/371180/ daenzer <div class="FormattedComment"> While that's true, at the very least it would mean no 3D acceleration, in some cases no acceleration at all.<br> </div> Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:43:32 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/371179/ https://lwn.net/Articles/371179/ daenzer <div class="FormattedComment"> The dependency on hal is gone since xserver-xorg 1:7.5~2.<br> </div> Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:40:58 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/370706/ https://lwn.net/Articles/370706/ mjg59 <div class="FormattedComment"> It's not an xorg or a udev issue - a bug in the kernel is causing the hotplug interrupt to fire <br> continuously, which results in the kernel delivering millions of messages to userspace. These are <br> processed by udev, which understandably consumes CPU in the process.<br> </div> Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:42 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/370650/ https://lwn.net/Articles/370650/ Pc5Y9sbv <div class="FormattedComment"> You would be amused to see what havoc udevd and xorg are causing for people with Fedora 12 on some Intel integrated graphics chipsets.<br> <p> Somehow X, udevd, and apcupsd of all things are going crazy on my media-center PC after every reboot. I have to kill off the udevd processes and sometimes apcupsd in order to get X to stop re-detecting its outputs in a flood.<br> </div> Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:16:20 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/370547/ https://lwn.net/Articles/370547/ nix <div class="FormattedComment"> The libudev patches were still being revised as of a few weeks ago: the <br> latest stable X server does indeed still depend on HAL. But you can <br> configure it out (and given how crashy HAL is I do so as a matter of <br> course: say what you like about libudev it's never caused programs to <br> coredump on me).<br> <p> </div> Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:58:25 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/370541/ https://lwn.net/Articles/370541/ thedevil <div class="FormattedComment"> The version now in Debian unstable is 7.5 and it still depends on HAL.<br> <p> </div> Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:14:56 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/370477/ https://lwn.net/Articles/370477/ nix <div class="FormattedComment"> That is, of course, that I doubt that *kernel* modesetting will ever be <br> mandatory on cards with hardware text mode support, simply because all the <br> kernel needs to do to disable kernel modesetting on a particular card is <br> to do nothing. Breaking that would be pointless.<br> <p> </div> Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:03:33 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/370475/ https://lwn.net/Articles/370475/ nix <div class="FormattedComment"> I doubt modesetting will ever be mandatory on graphics cards that support <br> a text mode at all. (People have been saying that cards with no text mode <br> support are just around the corner for years, but I've never seen one <br> outside a Sun workstation.)<br> <p> </div> Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:02:14 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/370443/ https://lwn.net/Articles/370443/ MisterIO <div class="FormattedComment"> I doubt it's that simple. If the kernel supports only KMS, it will obviously try to do the MS itself and the old X will try to do MS too. I can see some problems there.<br> </div> Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:15:26 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/370338/ https://lwn.net/Articles/370338/ nix <blockquote> this will force me to upgrade xorg if I want to upgrade the kernel </blockquote> Hardly. Userspace modesetting is a *userspace* thing, inside the X server. If you don't upgrade X, you get UMS just as always. Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:38:32 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/370332/ https://lwn.net/Articles/370332/ rahulsundaram <div class="FormattedComment"> Actually with the latest Xorg, the dependency on HAL is being removed since <br> HAL itself is now deprecated in favor of udisks, upower and just udev <br> itself. There are no direct dependencies on *Kit either. So you are <br> mistaken and can safely upgrade if these were your only objections. <br> </div> Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:23:25 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/370328/ https://lwn.net/Articles/370328/ foom <div class="FormattedComment"> <font class="QuotedText">&gt; I wonder if anyone else cares about this?</font><br> <p> Probably not. :)<br> </div> Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:57:22 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/370325/ https://lwn.net/Articles/370325/ thedevil <div class="FormattedComment"> Uh-oh.<br> <p> This will be a major headache for me, because this will force me to upgrade xorg if I want to upgrade the kernel. And I will let the new xorg on my boxes over my cold dead body - with its gratuitous dependencies on hal and *-kit and I don't know what else, plus its needlessly changed defaults.<br> <p> I wonder if anyone else cares about this?<br> <p> </div> Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:34:37 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/370050/ https://lwn.net/Articles/370050/ nix <div class="FormattedComment"> Interesting. It works on my 9250 (old) and my 4870 (new) pretty much <br> flawlessly: there are 3D artifacts in high-end stuff but 2D and simple 3D <br> (e.g. oolite, scorched3d, compositing) is perfect.<br> </div> Sat, 16 Jan 2010 13:56:25 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/369966/ https://lwn.net/Articles/369966/ Tet <div class="FormattedComment"> KMS is unusably broken on every Radeon on which I've tried it. It's a nice idea in principle, but to call it "supported" is pushing things a bit if my experiences are anything to go by.<br> <p> I'm all for removing non-KMS code once KMS is sufficiently stable. It's a *long* way from that right now.<br> </div> Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:13:06 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/369808/ https://lwn.net/Articles/369808/ kronos <div class="FormattedComment"> KMS is supported on all radeons: stable for r100-r500, staging for r600-r700.<br> </div> Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:39:21 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/369806/ https://lwn.net/Articles/369806/ xav <div class="FormattedComment"> Guess what ? I booted 2.6.32 on a server card with an old ATI ES1000, and the KMS identified it as an R100 and worked like a charm.<br> So I guess your Radeon 9200 is fully supported by KMS.<br> </div> Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:25:26 +0000 The end of user-space mode setting? https://lwn.net/Articles/369765/ https://lwn.net/Articles/369765/ lolando <div class="FormattedComment"> Are we discussing the end of user-space mode setting as a whole, or just for the hardware that has KMS working? I wouldn't care if it were the latter, but as far as I know (which is not much), KMS only exists for Intel, Nvidia and recent Radeons. Are there plans to port all existing drivers to KMS (such as for the Radeon 9200 I use daily or the ATI Rage in my laptop or the S3 Something in a dusty box I still keep just in case)? If so, I suspect the 2-3 years timeframe is slightly optimistic.<br> </div> Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:32:50 +0000