LWN: Comments on "Illustrating the Linux sock_sendpage() NULL pointer dereference" https://lwn.net/Articles/349999/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Illustrating the Linux sock_sendpage() NULL pointer dereference". en-us Thu, 16 Oct 2025 03:51:23 +0000 Thu, 16 Oct 2025 03:51:23 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Illustrating the Linux sock_sendpage() NULL pointer dereference https://lwn.net/Articles/350977/ https://lwn.net/Articles/350977/ dlang <div class="FormattedComment"> but the pulseaudio thing is a seperate vunerability.<br> <p> so what I think I am hearing you say is that if I don't use pulseaudio or SELinux on a system then I don't have to worry about this sock_sendpage() vunerability<br> </div> Sat, 05 Sep 2009 19:17:48 +0000 Illustrating the Linux sock_sendpage() NULL pointer dereference https://lwn.net/Articles/350968/ https://lwn.net/Articles/350968/ zhllg <div class="FormattedComment"> if you have pulseaudio, you are still vulnerable.<br> </div> Sat, 05 Sep 2009 13:23:19 +0000 Illustrating the Linux sock_sendpage() NULL pointer dereference https://lwn.net/Articles/350482/ https://lwn.net/Articles/350482/ dlang <div class="FormattedComment"> does this vunerability depend on the SELinux vunerability?<br> <p> if I have a system that doesn't use SELinux is this bug still there?<br> </div> Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:16:57 +0000