LWN: Comments on "A few SCO notes" https://lwn.net/Articles/34921/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "A few SCO notes". en-us Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:38:26 +0000 Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:38:26 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Is the code new? https://lwn.net/Articles/35092/ https://lwn.net/Articles/35092/ southey This was interesting in the transcipt:<p>18:08<p>Sonntag: &lt;stuff deleted&gt; We<br>have mostly focused on the source code in the last couple of years, and,<br>you know, have only taken certain snapshots of certain areas, and just<br>about in all cases we've identified in every major version significant<br>issues for which we are concerned. Is there extremely old versions that<br>may not be of issue? We do not know at this time. <p>Perhaps it is no wonder they don't want people to show the code. It may predate them!<br> <br> Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:34:35 +0000 German website https://lwn.net/Articles/35074/ https://lwn.net/Articles/35074/ corbet Interesting...it <i>was</i> up for a while...a very plain site with no mention of lawsuits or SCOsource. I was about to put up an article to that effect. One wonders what's going on... Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:02:27 +0000 German website https://lwn.net/Articles/35057/ https://lwn.net/Articles/35057/ jschrod I don't know when you looked, but as of 2003-06-05 15:20 CDT, <a href="http://www.sco.de/">http://www.sco.de/</a> is still blank. <p> Joachim Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:24:19 +0000 German website https://lwn.net/Articles/34976/ https://lwn.net/Articles/34976/ Ross I know the site was blank earlier today, but it's back up now. I only<br>wonder whether that means they have provided evidence to support their<br>claims or if they are now vulnerable to legal action now? Thu, 05 Jun 2003 03:06:19 +0000