LWN: Comments on "Sabayon Linux 4" https://lwn.net/Articles/316880/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Sabayon Linux 4". en-us Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:05:39 +0000 Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:05:39 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Sabayon Linux 4 https://lwn.net/Articles/327916/ https://lwn.net/Articles/327916/ balliet I have been using the various versions of Sabayon for about two years. With capable hardware SL is a pleasure to use. The desktop that I presently use is Gnome with Compiz-fusion, a wallpaper changer (over 1000 wallpapers), Avant Window Navigator, and various Screenlets. With all this the desktop is impressive on a 37 inch 1080p HDTV. The Samba problem was quickly fixed once the Sabayon team was told of the problem (it was only on the KDE side--SAMBA worked fine on the Gnome side). Every OS is a work in progress, and Sabayon is no exception, but given the variety of hardware out there, SL is so good. There are so many programs availblae to you through the Entropy/Spritz package management that you can get almost anything you want in one form or another. For those with less capable hardware, there is Sabayon MCELite which is great for inexpensive laptops. To get SL setup to meet ALL your desires, I think you need a moderate amount of confidence in your computer operating knowledge. Given that caveat, you will love it. Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:46:10 +0000 Sabayon Linux 4 https://lwn.net/Articles/318505/ https://lwn.net/Articles/318505/ PaulWay <div class="FormattedComment"> One can only hope it doesn't suffer the fate of Kororaa - another binary-packaged Gentoo distro with Compiz and binary-only graphics drivers. Kororaa died after some self-righteous kernel developer told Kororaa's packager Chris Smart that he'd personally offended the entire kernel development team.<br> <p> Best of luck,<br> <p> Paul<br> </div> Sun, 08 Feb 2009 07:59:45 +0000 Distro reviews becoming a bit pointless https://lwn.net/Articles/318238/ https://lwn.net/Articles/318238/ dirtyepic <div class="FormattedComment"> considering it's based on Gentoo, a graphical installer is noteworthy. i was specifically wondering about that.<br> </div> Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:32:26 +0000 Sabayon Linux 4 https://lwn.net/Articles/318175/ https://lwn.net/Articles/318175/ sobdk <div class="FormattedComment"> You obviously never used earlier versions of Sabayon. I don't recall which version it was but there was an old theme that was bright red/orange and nearly blinded me. It was a total pain to obliterate all the last bits of red on my system. I'm glad to hear they have shifted to a more eye pleasing theme. <br> </div> Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:12:21 +0000 Sabayon Linux 4 https://lwn.net/Articles/318152/ https://lwn.net/Articles/318152/ Trou.fr <div class="FormattedComment"> This review sounds so commercial to me.<br> <p> "The professional quality graphics feature gray tones with royal blue accents and is very easy on the eyes. This new theme reflects the maturity of the distribution and its developers."<br> <p> Come on, this is a LWN featured article, not a press release !<br> </div> Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:01:43 +0000 Distro reviews becoming a bit pointless https://lwn.net/Articles/318091/ https://lwn.net/Articles/318091/ epa <div class="FormattedComment"> In a review of a Linux distribution is it really worth the space to say that it includes the GIMP? Almost every distribution provides almost every major application. It's only worth comment if there is something unusual. The same goes for saying that the installer can run in graphics mode or that you can choose between GNOME and KDE.<br> <p> Choosing a distro these days is more about picking something with staying power: one that you expect will release security updates on time, respond to bug reports and release new versions with a smooth upgrade path. It would be good if reviews would focus more on that.<br> </div> Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:06:16 +0000