LWN: Comments on "A Mozilla year-end report" https://lwn.net/Articles/307888/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "A Mozilla year-end report". en-us Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:08:27 +0000 Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:08:27 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net A Mozilla year-end report https://lwn.net/Articles/308911/ https://lwn.net/Articles/308911/ gerv <div class="FormattedComment"> By community she means "development community". Are you suggesting that all these people are volunteering their time to work on Firefox, Thunderbird etc. "due to lack of viable alternatives"? If they hated the product, then surely the "lack of viable alternatives" would just be a second reason to leave the community and go and work on something else.<br> <p> Then again, "Who can refute a sneer?" -- William Paley.<br> <p> Gerv<br> <p> </div> Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:44:16 +0000 A Mozilla year-end report https://lwn.net/Articles/308214/ https://lwn.net/Articles/308214/ sbergman27 <div class="FormattedComment"> The winds of change are coming. I expect to see, for the first time, real competition in the FOSS browser market within about a year's time, as browsers like Epiphany complete their switch to WebKit, and Google Chrome becomes more popular on Windows, and becomes available for Linux.<br> </div> Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:45:03 +0000 A Mozilla year-end report https://lwn.net/Articles/308207/ https://lwn.net/Articles/308207/ alecs1 <div class="FormattedComment"> You made me curious, I try from time to time Konqueror and it's nice, but I find it lacking features and go back to Opera all the time.<br> Good example: it is the only browser where Flash is almost guaranteed not to crash.<br> Bad examples: it draws the page late if there are big images to load, I have found no flashblock functionality so it will download all the flash.<br> <p> Any Konqueror tips and trick wiki around?<br> </div> Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:21:08 +0000 A Mozilla year-end report https://lwn.net/Articles/308084/ https://lwn.net/Articles/308084/ nix <div class="FormattedComment"> No, no firefox add-ons: it's not XUL-based, so FF add-ons are kind of a <br> non-starter (unless someone writes a XUL implementation for Konqueror, a <br> *large* project).<br> <p> I can easily live without them. If you can't, you are indeed stuck.<br> </div> Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:28:55 +0000 A Mozilla year-end report https://lwn.net/Articles/308080/ https://lwn.net/Articles/308080/ jengelh <div class="FormattedComment"> Does it support firefox add-ons? I kinda don't want to miss out on Adblockplus and Firebug, which is what, er, keeps me in FF's realm.<br> </div> Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:57:39 +0000 A Mozilla year-end report https://lwn.net/Articles/308078/ https://lwn.net/Articles/308078/ nix <div class="FormattedComment"> On Windows you are probably right (although, Safari, perhaps?)<br> <p> On Linux, Konqi is definitely viable (I'm using it right now without any <br> trouble at all).<br> <p> </div> Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:53:15 +0000 A Mozilla year-end report https://lwn.net/Articles/308032/ https://lwn.net/Articles/308032/ flewellyn <div class="FormattedComment"> That's a bit harsh, don't you think? Mozilla may not be a perfect project (show me one that is!), and Firefox may not be a perfect browser, but there's hardly any coercion involved. Plus, Firefox really does offer a good browsing experience.<br> <p> Granted, there are ways in which the browser could definitely use improvement (process separation a la Google Chrome, for one), but every non-trivial piece of software could use improvement. So, whence your criticism?<br> </div> Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:17:28 +0000 A Mozilla year-end report https://lwn.net/Articles/307981/ https://lwn.net/Articles/307981/ jengelh <div class="FormattedComment"> <font class="QuotedText">&gt;Our community remains healthy and vibrant.</font><br> <p> Only due to lack of viable alternatives.<br> </div> Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:08:37 +0000