LWN: Comments on "The Linux Foundation puts a value on Linux" https://lwn.net/Articles/304275/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "The Linux Foundation puts a value on Linux". en-us Sun, 02 Nov 2025 16:46:35 +0000 Sun, 02 Nov 2025 16:46:35 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net duplicated work https://lwn.net/Articles/304577/ https://lwn.net/Articles/304577/ DonDiego <div class="FormattedComment"> While these numbers are informative, they are not really suitable for comparison. A Linux distribution contains any number of IRC clients, editors, window managers, desktops and many other programs that perform the same function or a very similar function. It would be interesting to know the value of a complete software stack without duplication as well.<br> </div> Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:48:18 +0000 The Linux Foundation puts a value on Linux https://lwn.net/Articles/304407/ https://lwn.net/Articles/304407/ jasonjgw <div class="FormattedComment"> As I remember, the results of running sloccount over one of the Debian<br> releases were published several years ago. Perhaps the immanent release of<br> Lenny would be a good opportunity to repeat the process, if anyone has the<br> resources and inclination to do so.<br> <p> Since Debian contains one of the largest collections of foss, if not the<br> largest, the total sloc would give an approximation of the monetary value of<br> what the free/open-source software community has created and continues to<br> maintain and improve. This is not to suggest that undue importance should be<br> placed on the monetary value (effectively, the replacement cost), since there<br> are many other respects in which the software is valuable to people. However,<br> this particular measure is at least readily quantifiable.<br> </div> Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:31:03 +0000 The Linux Foundation puts a value on Linux https://lwn.net/Articles/304322/ https://lwn.net/Articles/304322/ tjasper <div class="FormattedComment"> David,<br> <p> In your post, you note that deleted lines are not counted in the SLOC costing estimates. I wonder, that if in a way, they are. The costings, I believe, are based on what a developer might produce and be paid for. I don't believe that developers produce perfect results first time, so there is undoubtably some wasted code. Similarly, they might develop chunks of code which are never used, paid for, or completely re-written - or the customer changes their mind (apparently can happen!!!!) and code is redundant. Therefore, it is a reasonable approximation to say that code deletions are somewhat covered by the costing rationale i.e. even paid developers don't get paid exactly for every SLOC they write.<br> <p> Just my $0.02<br> <p> YellowShed<br> </div> Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:18:31 +0000 The Linux Foundation puts a value on Linux https://lwn.net/Articles/304310/ https://lwn.net/Articles/304310/ dwheeler Very neat! <a href="http://www.dwheeler.com/blog/2008/10/22/#development-cost-linux-2008">I've posted some comments about the Linux Foundation's 2008 study</a>. Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:56:20 +0000