LWN: Comments on "A proposed revised Fedora 10 schedule" https://lwn.net/Articles/295445/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "A proposed revised Fedora 10 schedule". en-us Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:58:12 +0000 Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:58:12 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Revised schedule, or lack thereof https://lwn.net/Articles/295662/ https://lwn.net/Articles/295662/ pr1268 <p>Agreed... I think that the <i>lack</i> of an altered release schedule based on the recent RH/Fedora compromise/intrusion could send a message that Fedora has a lackadaisical approach to security (which they don't), or that they simply don't have a frikkin' clue (which they do). :-)</p> Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:34:32 +0000 A proposed revised Fedora 10 schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/295643/ https://lwn.net/Articles/295643/ qg6te2 Not the most productive or useful comment. The incident at Fedora can happen at other distros, and we all distros can learn this experience. Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:55:34 +0000 A proposed revised Fedora 10 schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/295606/ https://lwn.net/Articles/295606/ sbergman27 <div class="FormattedComment"> Hurreh! Hurreh! Hurreh! Getcher compromised OS here! They're going fast! Get yers while ye can! Hurreh! Hurreh!<br> <br> </div> Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:36:10 +0000