LWN: Comments on "MySQL 4.1.0 released" https://lwn.net/Articles/28337/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "MySQL 4.1.0 released". en-us Sun, 31 Aug 2025 12:47:31 +0000 Sun, 31 Aug 2025 12:47:31 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net MySQL have very good versioning https://lwn.net/Articles/28458/ https://lwn.net/Articles/28458/ coriordan Actually, MySQL's version scheme is very good.<p>&gt; could we start calling this 4.1alpha1<p>No, that's not what the &quot;alpha&quot; means. &quot;alpha&quot; refers to how tested the<br>new parts of the code are. In a month or two, when all major bugs<br>have been squashed, a version (maybe 4.1.4) will be judged as &quot;beta&quot;<br>quality. Once bug reports stop coming in for 4.1.X they will announce<br>that it is &quot;Production&quot; quality (this could be 4.1.20 or 4.1.15 or whatever)<p>The Apache Foundation run a similar scheme. The actual version number of<br>&quot;Apache 2.0&quot; was 2.0.24.<p>It's a bit like calling Linux 2.5 &quot;Alpha&quot; and, 2.4.21 &quot;Production&quot;.<p>One of it's purposes is to show the different user groups when they should<br>adopt the new version. Most developers probably use the Alpha or Beta<br>branches, while mission-critical datacenters would only use Production<br>branches.<p>Ciaran O'Riordan<br> Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:37:43 +0000 MySQL 4.1.0 released https://lwn.net/Articles/28438/ https://lwn.net/Articles/28438/ Baylink It's version number is 4.1.0... but it's an *ALPHA*.<p>&lt;screech volume=loud type=anguished&gt;<p>&quot;Just keep repeating it until they follow along&quot; seems to be working for Bush... could we start calling this 4.1alpha1, like real software engineers, and hope that it might stick? Thu, 10 Apr 2003 15:32:25 +0000 MySQL 4.1.0 released https://lwn.net/Articles/28380/ https://lwn.net/Articles/28380/ Dom2 Hmmm, I'm curious as to how a join would work on two columns of different character sets.... <p>-Dom Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:31:23 +0000