LWN: Comments on "Fedora 9 released" https://lwn.net/Articles/281910/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Fedora 9 released". en-us Sun, 12 Oct 2025 05:22:39 +0000 Sun, 12 Oct 2025 05:22:39 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Fedora slow keys and stuttering response https://lwn.net/Articles/283450/ https://lwn.net/Articles/283450/ HugoA <div class="FormattedComment"><pre> Also, you can try to disable smooth scrolling in firefox (in options under advanced -&gt; general). Ironically, disabling it makes scrolling a lot smoother for me. FC2/3 was a long time ago, and I've never seen this stuttering (been with fedora since FC6). </pre></div> Thu, 22 May 2008 11:02:22 +0000 Blaming Python? https://lwn.net/Articles/282880/ https://lwn.net/Articles/282880/ AnswerGuy <div class="FormattedComment"><pre> Perhaps blaming the language for the programmer's mistake makes no sense. You say it's a backtrace. In Python that happens when someone didn't anticipate some exception or chose not to catch it. If you're going to suggest that the choice of programming language is somehow wrong then you'll have to explain just exactly what this backtrace is and why a competent programmer would have been unable to avoid it. (For example if the backtrace pointed to a bug in one of the Python standard libraries, or if some bug in the runtime/interpreter triggered it, or triggered some exceptional condition such as OOM, that, in turn, cause this. Are you seriously suggesting that higher quality of code would have been likely if they had chosen C, C++, Perl? (Personally I have found that the code in Anaconda is just about the worst quality Python programming I've never seen. Their kickstart parser is fragile and completely inadequate even for the limited exposure to sysadmins. But I don't blame that on their choice of language. Also the whole process is so tightly coupled together that it seems impossible for them to support something as simple as: %pre does all my partitioning, filesystem formatting, and mounting --- everything is on /mnt/sysimage and I've generated my own fstab; skip to the package installation!) (If they had than then there'd be no need for an rpmstrap command --- you'd just run anaconda with the correct "--skip" argument and your virtual iSCSI installation would be all done where you're Xen, KVM, VMWare or whatever could go pick it up and use it). Bah. -- JimD </pre></div> Sun, 18 May 2008 09:39:15 +0000 Fedora slow keys and stuttering response https://lwn.net/Articles/282512/ https://lwn.net/Articles/282512/ proski Firefox can be unresponsive sometimes, but other applications running at the same time don't seem to be affected. Thu, 15 May 2008 15:00:24 +0000 Fedora slow keys and stuttering response https://lwn.net/Articles/282502/ https://lwn.net/Articles/282502/ pr1268 <p>Just curious, do recent versions of Fedora still have that dreaded &quot;stuttering&quot; response? I'm referring to latency issues with mouse pointer movement, keystroke response, and page scrolling most visible when running Firefox, noticeable back in the FC2/FC3 days. A Fedora user at my local LUG said it was due to a near-constant stream of memory page faults.</p> <p>I've never noticed such latency issues in any distro other than Red Hat and Fedora...</p> Thu, 15 May 2008 14:50:04 +0000 Fedora 9 released https://lwn.net/Articles/282338/ https://lwn.net/Articles/282338/ proski At night, the <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445898">slow keys</a> come. Wed, 14 May 2008 20:21:56 +0000 Fedora 9 released https://lwn.net/Articles/282305/ https://lwn.net/Articles/282305/ dougg <div class="FormattedComment"><pre> In trying to upgrade a dual boot machine (w2000/Fedora8) with the i386 DVD it failed with "duplicate labels". Strange, upgrades from FC5-&gt;FC6-&gt;FC7-&gt;F8 worked fine on the same machine in the past. And Fedora on that machine is "clean" in the sense only "yum update"s have been done. I'm not the only one having problems: <a href="http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=E800C1E1-17A4-0F78-316FA48755E1A1AB">http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=E800C1E1-17A4-0F78-316FA...</a> and I also got the "Try 2" error. F9 is starting to look three quarter baked. </pre></div> Wed, 14 May 2008 18:41:29 +0000 Upgrade is broken again :-( https://lwn.net/Articles/282255/ https://lwn.net/Articles/282255/ proski GUI upgrade for i386 shows a Python backtrace as soon as I select upgrade. Details belong to bugzilla, of course, but we need to think why such major bugs happen over and over again. Perhaps Python is not really suitable for that kind of task? And of course even very basic testing would have discovered the problem. While many people, myself included, track rawhide on some systems, the installer appears to get very little attention. Wed, 14 May 2008 16:36:59 +0000 Preupgrade https://lwn.net/Articles/282121/ https://lwn.net/Articles/282121/ DG <div class="FormattedComment"><pre> This page might be a better link - <a href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=48938">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=48938</a> </pre></div> Wed, 14 May 2008 06:08:28 +0000 Preupgrade https://lwn.net/Articles/282037/ https://lwn.net/Articles/282037/ jkowing <div class="FormattedComment"><pre> Thanks for the tip! I've been hoping Fedora would someday have this option available. It may seem a small thing, but it makes upgrading to a new release seem so much nicer and easier. I just did an over-the-net distribution upgrade on Ubuntu that worked pretty well. Great job Fedora folks! </pre></div> Tue, 13 May 2008 19:52:54 +0000 Preupgrade https://lwn.net/Articles/281964/ https://lwn.net/Articles/281964/ chema Just If someone is interested. You can find <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PreUpgrade">preupgrade</a> rpm's <a href="http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/looking-for-a-preupgrade-with-sulphurf9-listed-as-an-upgrade-target/">here</a>, just in case you'll like to try this kind of live upgrade (from F7,F8 -> F9). I'm just upgrading my laptop with it. -- Chema Tue, 13 May 2008 17:12:25 +0000