LWN: Comments on "The new Debian etch release schedule" https://lwn.net/Articles/225932/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "The new Debian etch release schedule". en-us Sun, 26 Oct 2025 01:03:18 +0000 Sun, 26 Oct 2025 01:03:18 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/228953/ https://lwn.net/Articles/228953/ woakley So chaps. Any news on where you're at now? Would be very helpful to get some idea. I note that the releases page hasn't been touched with any updates.<br> <p> regards<br> <p> - William<br> Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:42:58 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/226525/ https://lwn.net/Articles/226525/ Segora For me it was a custom installation based on Debian (whatever was current in '95) on a 386SX16 w/ 2MB, as far as I remember. Stripped down kernel, UUCP, some console mail user agent. Probably something like Xpoint would have worked better, but hey - it worked good enough and was completely free.<br> <p> Sat, 17 Mar 2007 10:53:43 +0000 Longest-running Debian installation? https://lwn.net/Articles/226465/ https://lwn.net/Articles/226465/ stevem My first Debian installation from October 1996 is still going. It has been migrated across to new disks and new hardware multiple times in the interim, and (obviously) upgraded quite a few times since.<br> <p> It was my only machine at the time, a 486 DX4/120 IIRC. It's now running on a dual-core AMD64 and is the main server at home, used for NFS space, music and (of course) the local Debian mirror. It's also the machine where most debian-cd development work happens.<br> <p> The only thing that may kill it now is the fact that I'd like to move over from i386 to amd64. Once I do the etch upgrade, I'll look into that; I hope I can find a way to keep it going despite an architecture change... :-)<br> Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:12:40 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/226289/ https://lwn.net/Articles/226289/ a9db0 I've an old firewall that started with (pause whilst I dig through a large stack of CDs) Potato. Currently a Sarge/Etch blend. Still runs fine. I'll replace it when some component of it dies - though it's a 10 year old Compaq P90 that shows no signs of failure.<br> <p> <p> Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:59:36 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/226233/ https://lwn.net/Articles/226233/ ballombe <font class="QuotedText">&gt; What is the longest anybody here has had a single Debian install going, (especially if it was for a personal desktop)?</font><br> <p> I know of two desktop machines (only one being used daily) that started their<br> life with Slink (in 1999) and are still running now, after being upgraded to each newer release up to Sarge and they probably be upgraded to Etch once it is released.<br> <p> On a unrelated note, I managed to install woody on a m68k with 4Mb of RAM.<br> (a Falcon 030 at 16MHz).<br> Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:31:38 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/226186/ https://lwn.net/Articles/226186/ cortana Try <a href="http://people.debian.org/~sesse/bugscan/">http://people.debian.org/~sesse/bugscan/</a> instead. It is a version of the official RC bugs graph that has extra code that takes into account version tracking information from the bug tracking system. It should display the same info as the bts.turmzimmer.net page with the correct flags set.<br> Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:34:44 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/226185/ https://lwn.net/Articles/226185/ broonie The larger count includes bugs that aren't in the release candidate (for example, because the package is not going to be released).<br> Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:33:19 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/226114/ https://lwn.net/Articles/226114/ rmayr My desktop machine is running Debian unstable since about 1999, and still <br> counting. And yes, it's basically the same install from back then, I just <br> regularly try to spend some time to clean up old cruft.<br> Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:04:36 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/226112/ https://lwn.net/Articles/226112/ maney Hmmm... it was a long time ago. Maybe 4MB wasn't quite enough for the installer, even though it was plenty for a small server or firewall sort of thing and I've misremembered the numbers. There were a couple of these old 386SX desktop boxes sitting aorund, so I might have stuffed two machine's portions into one for installation. They were the remains of a DOS/Windows 3.x lab that was on its last legs, and I'm thinking that 4M would have been fairly hefty for that (bearing in mind they were old ten years ago, and that district *always* bought the minimal spec they could get away with at the time of purchase). <p> Anyway, as near as I recall, Debian's release schedules were kind of flexible even back then. :-) Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:03:04 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/226110/ https://lwn.net/Articles/226110/ drag Not I. <br> <p> The leastest (is that a word? It should be if it isn't) machine I ever had Linux installed on was a old 386 Thinkpad laptop with 6 megs of RAM. This was maybe 4 years ago? I had to use a special floppy-edition that was unusual (most floppy-based distros required you to load the disk into RAM to free up the disk for more stuff. I didn't have enough ram to do that). Then I had to install my software using packages from some ancient version of Slackware.<br> <p> I wanted to use it as a serial terminal. Ended up blowing Linux away and went with MSDOS + kermit. (nowadays I'd use freedos). I liked that a lot. It is my opinion that no laptop should ever be thrown away as long as it has a decent screen, a keyboard, and a serial port. :-)<br> <p> <p> What is the longest anybody here has had a single Debian install going, (especially if it was for a personal desktop)?<br> <p> I know I had one install going from about 3 years and a few months, which I know isn't that long. I tracked unstable and I actually transfered it from drive to drive once as my hardware gradually upgraded. It probably outlasted 3 major revisions of hardware for my desktop.<br> <p> Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:31:40 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/226089/ https://lwn.net/Articles/226089/ maney Debian obeys Brook's Other Law, which tells us to plan on throwing one deadline away, because we will anyway. :-) <p> I think I first installed Debian in the days of Bo, but it was probably Hamm by the time I was running it <i>seriously</i>. Remember when you could install on a box with 4M of RAM? Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:32:32 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/226037/ https://lwn.net/Articles/226037/ k8to That page, while interesting, isn't really self documenting. The colors, some of the markings are not explained, and have meaning. I've stumbled on it before.<br> Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:43:08 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/226013/ https://lwn.net/Articles/226013/ aisotton They won't make it. They never have. It'll be May (at least) until they release.<br> <p> Greetings,<br> Aaron -- Using Debian since potato<br> Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:36:46 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/225953/ https://lwn.net/Articles/225953/ pflugstad If you follow the link [2] provided in the email, it shows 32 open bugs. I don't know what the difference is, nor do I follow Debian development enough - just pointing this out.<br> <p> Pete<br> Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:31:59 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/225951/ https://lwn.net/Articles/225951/ svena No, see [2] above, there are 32 RC bugs for Etch.<br> <p> Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:21:45 +0000 The new Debian etch release schedule https://lwn.net/Articles/225945/ https://lwn.net/Articles/225945/ ss Good to know they are upholding tradition and are already behind schedule.<br> <p> Mar 13 there should be only 40 bugs, but the bug page at<br> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/">http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/</a><br> reports 70 for today.<br> Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:52:14 +0000