LWN: Comments on "Novell launches openSUSE.org" https://lwn.net/Articles/146871/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Novell launches openSUSE.org". en-us Fri, 17 Oct 2025 12:17:30 +0000 Fri, 17 Oct 2025 12:17:30 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Bleeding edge? What about PHP? https://lwn.net/Articles/147496/ https://lwn.net/Articles/147496/ mdekkers refresh my memory please - what mainstream distro's include PHP 5.1?<br> Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:20:52 +0000 Bleeding edge? What about PHP? https://lwn.net/Articles/146958/ https://lwn.net/Articles/146958/ denials Ah, thank you -- I hadn't seen that source in any of the install <br> documentation, and while I assumed that YaST would deliver updates, I <br> though it would just contain the same packages as were on the CD. <br> <br> Thanks for the tip! <br> Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:23:33 +0000 Bleeding edge? What about PHP? https://lwn.net/Articles/146942/ https://lwn.net/Articles/146942/ denials Thanks, dlang, but openSUSE is supposed to be a community distro, not an <br> enterprise distro. As a community distro, it should have more latitude to <br> be on the bleeding edge--especially given that SuSE Professional 9.3 <br> packaged PHP 5.0.3. <br> <br> I realize that this is structured like the Fedora/Red Hat Enterprise Linux <br> relationship: Novell will evaluate the contents of the community distro <br> (10.0, 10.1?) to determine what they will stand behind and officially <br> support in the next version of SuSE Linux Enterprise Server, Novell <br> Desktop, etc. <br> <br> Including PHP 5.0 in the first iteration of the community distro, then <br> lifting that to PHP 5.1 when the release does happen (even in the openSUSE <br> 10.1 stream), would seem to be the sensible thing to do _for a community <br> distro_. <br> <br> openSUSE is still very new and will undoubtedly go through some growing <br> pains as it learns to be a community distro (in the sense of transparent <br> development decisions, packaging rationale, and open discussions with <br> users, upstream developers, and would-be contributors). The third goal <br> listed in their project overview recognizes this requirement: <br> <br> "Dramatically simplify and open the development and packaging processes to <br> make SUSE Linux the platform of choice for Linux hackers and application <br> developers". <br> Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:19:01 +0000 Bleeding edge? What about PHP? https://lwn.net/Articles/146937/ https://lwn.net/Articles/146937/ cthiel Actually PHP5 is in SUSE Linux 10.0 OSS Beta1, it's not on the CD set. Simply add <a rel="nofollow" href="http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-10.0-OSS-beta1/inst-source/">http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-10.0...</a> as an installation source in YaST an get the php5 packages. That should be it!<br> Wed, 10 Aug 2005 04:38:29 +0000 Bleeding edge? What about PHP? https://lwn.net/Articles/146936/ https://lwn.net/Articles/146936/ dlang complaining that a beta for an enterprise release doesn't include a yet-to-be-released version of something is beyond bleeding edge.<br> <p> enterprise distros wait until after a release is made and then test it to see if it's advances are good enough to outweigh it's regressions (like the performance regression you mention for PHP 5.0)<br> <p> given that Open Source software doesn't have fixed release dates, anyone who in Aug is depending on a release being made by some opensource project in time for their own release in Sept is makeing a mistake that they are unlikly to be able to recover from cleanly<br> Wed, 10 Aug 2005 04:36:41 +0000 Bleeding edge? What about PHP? https://lwn.net/Articles/146933/ https://lwn.net/Articles/146933/ denials I downloaded the 10.0 beta today and found that openSUSE 10.0 included PHP 4.4.0, even though PHP 5.0 has been out for a year. <br> <p> It would be interesting to hear Novell's rationale behind that choice; PHP 5.0, which introduced real object-oriented support, has been criticized for being much slower than the 4.x stream, but PHP 5.1 (first release candidate coming out any day now) is supposed to correct those problems _and_ introduce PHP Data Objects, the standardized database access interface implemented in C that PHP has needed for some time now.<br> <p> There's still time, I suppose, for openSUSE to update their packages for PHP 5.1.0; that would be truly bleeding edge. I suppose that until/unless openSUSE gathers a true community these kinds of decisions will be mostly opaque to developers and users outside of Novell.<br> Wed, 10 Aug 2005 04:06:24 +0000 Novell launches openSUSE.org https://lwn.net/Articles/146931/ https://lwn.net/Articles/146931/ jwb Shows what I know. It didn't look like a Wiki at first glance, but I see now that it is.<br> Wed, 10 Aug 2005 02:56:01 +0000 Novell launches openSUSE.org https://lwn.net/Articles/146926/ https://lwn.net/Articles/146926/ jamesh opensuse.org appears to be a wiki.<br> Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:10:54 +0000 It's 10.0, not 10.1 https://lwn.net/Articles/146922/ https://lwn.net/Articles/146922/ jmayer The release will be 10.0, not 10.1. At that date the development/testing <br> cycle for 10.1 will BEGIN. <br> Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:47:08 +0000 Novell launches openSUSE.org https://lwn.net/Articles/146919/ https://lwn.net/Articles/146919/ jwb Where's the Wiki?<br> Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:01:17 +0000 release date not quite correct https://lwn.net/Articles/146901/ https://lwn.net/Articles/146901/ niner The roadmap states that "Beginning on Sep 28, 2005, we will regularly release alpha snapshots." (SUSE Linux 10.1 Schedule)<br> <p> There is no release date set for SUSE Linux 10.0<br> Tue, 09 Aug 2005 22:11:05 +0000