https://lwn.net/Articles/145135/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Is CKRM worth it?". en-us Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:48:58 +0000 Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:48:58 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net https://lwn.net/Articles/147037/ https://lwn.net/Articles/147037/ zakaelri I am not a kernel developer, nor will I probably ever be one, but what would the feasibility be for creating a generic hook system be? <br> <p> It seems that with so many different subsystems being overlayed, that a "unified/generic hook system", or something akin to it, would be a good idea. Kernel developers would only need to manage that aspect, and leave it to the other projects to implement systems that utilize it.<br> <p> Again, this is stated without any in-depth knowledge of linux kernel systems... only what I have managde to pick up reading LWN for the past year or so.<br> Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:58:50 +0000 https://lwn.net/Articles/145289/ https://lwn.net/Articles/145289/ ohanssen Found it. <a href="http://ckrm.sf.net">http://ckrm.sf.net</a> of course :-)<br> Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:13:06 +0000 https://lwn.net/Articles/145284/ https://lwn.net/Articles/145284/ ohanssen Interesting. Any documentation on how to use this? Is CKRM somehow related to the earlier QLinux effort? <br> <p> Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:19:51 +0000