LWN: Comments on "Which is the fairest I/O scheduler of them all?" https://lwn.net/Articles/114770/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Which is the fairest I/O scheduler of them all?". en-us Thu, 09 Oct 2025 20:50:10 +0000 Thu, 09 Oct 2025 20:50:10 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net RHEL4 https://lwn.net/Articles/115819/ https://lwn.net/Articles/115819/ Milan Current Beta2 of Red Hat Enterprise Linux has CFQ scheduler too so it seems to be more liked by vendors at this time.<br> Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:27:03 +0000 Which is the fairest I/O scheduler of them all? https://lwn.net/Articles/115815/ https://lwn.net/Articles/115815/ philips Well, distro's could make simple applet to change i/o scheduler.<br> <p> And later on users depending on their workloads can choose whatever they want.<br> <p> But it is rather nice that Linux got two that good i/o schedulers ;)<br> Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:08:24 +0000 Which is the fairest I/O scheduler of them all? https://lwn.net/Articles/115097/ https://lwn.net/Articles/115097/ xorbe I've always wanted my box to have a CFQ disk scheduler. The current high latency drives me up the wall. It's just silly. I don't even care if throughout drops somewhat, I want my box to *respond*.<br> Thu, 09 Dec 2004 22:48:50 +0000 Which is the fairest I/O scheduler of them all? https://lwn.net/Articles/114905/ https://lwn.net/Articles/114905/ yusufg Fedora Core also uses the CFQ as the default I/O scheduler<br> Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:20:08 +0000