LWN: Comments on "The LWN.net 2004 Linux Timeline" https://lwn.net/Articles/111875/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "The LWN.net 2004 Linux Timeline". en-us Fri, 05 Sep 2025 16:43:14 +0000 Fri, 05 Sep 2025 16:43:14 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Ubuntu on servers? https://lwn.net/Articles/119083/ https://lwn.net/Articles/119083/ emj Debian Stable I thought that was just servers, I don't see how they would be using Ubuntu.<br> Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:17:26 +0000 The LWN.net 2004 Linux Timeline https://lwn.net/Articles/117992/ https://lwn.net/Articles/117992/ randy For kicks, everyone really needs to go back and read the previous year's versions. Especially the gloom and doom for Linux quotes from some of the industry "experts". I really like the one stating that Oracle would never support Linux. :) Look back and see how far we've come!<br> <p> Great job, as usual, LWN!<br> Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:02:48 +0000 The LWN.net 2004 Linux Timeline https://lwn.net/Articles/117510/ https://lwn.net/Articles/117510/ vmole <p>The truly sad part is that I've been around Debian so long that I didn't realize he was making a joke... Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:25:23 +0000 Obvious, predictable objection https://lwn.net/Articles/117457/ https://lwn.net/Articles/117457/ ncm I guess that would be <a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/112705/bigpage">here</a>. Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:30:32 +0000 The LWN.net 2004 Linux Timeline https://lwn.net/Articles/117444/ https://lwn.net/Articles/117444/ iabervon I still think the "obvious, predictable objection to the inclusion of this utility" line is the funniest thing I heard this year.<br> Thu, 30 Dec 2004 18:23:36 +0000