LWN: Comments on "Introducing Space Grade Linux" https://lwn.net/Articles/1036168/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Introducing Space Grade Linux". en-us Sat, 04 Oct 2025 11:54:31 +0000 Sat, 04 Oct 2025 11:54:31 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Is there nothing better than Yocto? https://lwn.net/Articles/1038342/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1038342/ sam.thursfield <div class="FormattedComment"> BuildStream is an attempt to design a build tool that is more robust than BitBake. And Freedesktop SDK works as a corresponding "reference distribution." At this stage, BuildStream is being used in production in some places, but has only a small community and very minimal investment. You'll find it interesting as a way to explore software integration with a different set of core concepts to BitBake.<br> </div> Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:08:24 +0000 Is there nothing better than Yocto? https://lwn.net/Articles/1037996/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1037996/ intgr <div class="FormattedComment"> <span class="QuotedText">&gt; Reproducing builds are very valuable. Even more so in the environment where radiation can cause bit flips.</span><br> <p> Surely at this point we're talking about systems that will be built on Earth and merely *deployed* to space -- there's no radiation in the build environment.<br> <p> Reproducible builds are great when delivering packages to distrusting downstream users. It wouldn't hurt but it matters less if the same organization is responsible for both build infra and deployment.<br> </div> Fri, 12 Sep 2025 22:52:12 +0000 Is there nothing better than Yocto? https://lwn.net/Articles/1037398/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1037398/ Arrange1030 <div class="FormattedComment"> I'm already using Nix, and a minimal system config weighs in at almost 4GB. I guess I can try not-os next.<br> </div> Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:34:09 +0000 Is there nothing better than Yocto? https://lwn.net/Articles/1037394/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1037394/ proski NixOS is somewhat in the same niche. It's harder to learn (it involved learning a special purpose functional language), but it's very rewarding. Reproducing builds are very valuable. Even more so in the environment where radiation can cause bit flips. Tue, 09 Sep 2025 22:41:14 +0000 Is there nothing better than Yocto? https://lwn.net/Articles/1037355/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1037355/ tbird20d <div class="FormattedComment"> Buildroot has been used for a lot of Linux-based space missions. When I talked to people doing Linux-based cubesats at the SmallSat conference a few years ago, many of them had not heard of Yocto. A lot of projects get their kernel and distro from a satellite bus supplier (which usually includes the flight computer), and don't build the kernel themselves. In my experience, fiddling with details of the OS is a low priority task, relative to the custom development that is done for whatever payload the mission is carrying.<br> </div> Tue, 09 Sep 2025 16:27:17 +0000 Is there nothing better than Yocto? https://lwn.net/Articles/1037351/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1037351/ Arrange1030 <div class="FormattedComment"> Are there any recent projects that are in the same niche as Yocto?<br> </div> Tue, 09 Sep 2025 15:09:29 +0000