LWN: Comments on "Debian Project Leader election 2025 edition" https://lwn.net/Articles/1016107/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Debian Project Leader election 2025 edition". en-us Mon, 06 Oct 2025 10:34:46 +0000 Mon, 06 Oct 2025 10:34:46 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Longer term? https://lwn.net/Articles/1017115/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1017115/ Phantom_Hoover I heard that one of the Herculaneum papyri might contain a manuscript of Cicero’s lost <i>de debiani regis</i>, actually. Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:49:06 +0000 Longer term? https://lwn.net/Articles/1017044/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1017044/ jzb <div class="FormattedComment"> They did? How many Linux releases did they manage to put out? Not even one. <br> </div> Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:30:19 +0000 Longer term? https://lwn.net/Articles/1017019/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1017019/ Phantom_Hoover <div class="FormattedComment"> 1 year terms worked fine for the Romans!<br> </div> Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:20:46 +0000 Longer term? https://lwn.net/Articles/1016984/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1016984/ guillemj Anthony Towns <a href="https://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_001">lost reelection in 2007</a>. Mehdi Dogguy <a href="https://www.debian.org/vote/2017/vote_001">lost reelection in 2017</a>. Wed, 09 Apr 2025 20:44:30 +0000 Longer term? https://lwn.net/Articles/1016983/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1016983/ highvoltage <div class="FormattedComment"> You're right, but like others have pointed out, re-election is possible if the voting Debian population feels confident in someone's abilities to drive things forward.<br> <p> On the flip side, it's possible that a DPL just doesn't work out. Even if they're capable, their circumstances might change, or it might not just be as fulfilling as they have imagined.<br> <p> Whatever the case might be for it not working out, a year is is short enough so that they can gracefully step back without too much embarrassment, or without being in the position for too long while having given up.<br> </div> Wed, 09 Apr 2025 19:11:30 +0000 Campaign period ended https://lwn.net/Articles/1016977/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1016977/ jzb <div class="FormattedComment"> Thanks for the clarification. I wanted to make it clear to readers that I didn't omit a reply in order to give Jackson the last word, or something like that. <br> </div> Wed, 09 Apr 2025 17:50:30 +0000 Campaign period ended https://lwn.net/Articles/1016976/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1016976/ tille <div class="FormattedComment"> s/voting/campaign/<br> </div> Wed, 09 Apr 2025 17:42:58 +0000 Campaign period ended https://lwn.net/Articles/1016975/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1016975/ tille <div class="FormattedComment"> "Tille did not respond to those points." <br> The reason is that the campain period ended at 2025-04-05 while the response from Jackson was sent at Sun, 6 Apr 2025. Candidates are not supposed to answer before or after the voting period.<br> </div> Wed, 09 Apr 2025 17:40:07 +0000 Longer term? https://lwn.net/Articles/1016974/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1016974/ corbet Bdale Garbee <a href="https://www.debian.org/vote/2003/vote_0001">lost reelection in 2003;</a>; I'm not sure if there are other examples. Wed, 09 Apr 2025 17:27:54 +0000 Longer term? https://lwn.net/Articles/1016973/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1016973/ stefanor <div class="FormattedComment"> If a DPL run for re-election they get re-elected (I can't recall any counter-examples). In many cases nobody even runs against them.<br> <p> The job is a real time commitment, and we don't want to ask people to commit for multiple years. Really, we're giving our volunteer DPLs a chance to step back, every year.<br> </div> Wed, 09 Apr 2025 17:23:53 +0000 Longer term? https://lwn.net/Articles/1016935/ https://lwn.net/Articles/1016935/ Trou.fr <div class="FormattedComment"> I'm not familiar with Debian discussions but has there been any talk of electing a DPL for a longer term? 1 year seems awfully short to make any progress.<br> </div> Wed, 09 Apr 2025 15:43:27 +0000