LWN: Comments on "That OpenSSL Worm" https://lwn.net/Articles/10119/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "That OpenSSL Worm". en-us Sun, 31 Aug 2025 14:23:35 +0000 Sun, 31 Aug 2025 14:23:35 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net How widespread, really? https://lwn.net/Articles/10506/ https://lwn.net/Articles/10506/ ion++ Not only Unix servers need compliant people to maintain them. All computers needs complaint and competent people to maintain them, it doesnt matter what kind of computer it is.<p><p>JonB Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:10:43 +0000 How widespread, really? https://lwn.net/Articles/10463/ https://lwn.net/Articles/10463/ nas I think the press is slightly exaggerating the spread of this worm. Read the story and it sounds like a Unix version of Code Red. When Code Red was in full force I saw tons of bogus requests in our server's access logs. When I heard about the OpenSSL worm I immediately setup an iptables logging rule on one of our machines to watch for it. I haven't seen a single packet on UDP port 2002. <p> I'm not saying Unix is not vulnerable to the same types of security problems as Windows. Unix servers need compliant people to maintain them. Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:39:02 +0000 That OpenSSL Worm https://lwn.net/Articles/10322/ https://lwn.net/Articles/10322/ beejaybee &quot;In the unlikely event that you haven't already, applying the appropriate OpenSSL update might be a very good thing to do before reading any further.&quot;<p>Except you've probably already been hit :( Please don't be suckered into the delusion that applying the patch will cure an already-infected system.<p>This incident brings into sharp relief the necessity of staying on top of the (unfortunately, endless) job of keeping your systems patched.<p> Thu, 19 Sep 2002 08:29:05 +0000