The 2006 Linux Kernel Summit
![]() |
| The group photo is available in medium and high resolution. |
The 2006 Linux Kernel Summit was scheduled for its traditional time: the two days prior to the opening of the Ottawa Linux Symposium. Also following tradition, LWN editor Jonathan Corbet, a member of the Summit program committee, was there and taking notes.
Day 1: July 17
Discussions held during the first day of the Kernel Summit include:
- The processor panel, wherein
three vendors discuss their future product plans with the kernel
developers.
- Mini-summit summaries: updates from
the storage, wireless networking, filesystems, memory management, and
power management mini-summits.
- Kernel quality and development
process. Andrew Morton looks into whether the kernel really has a
quality problem, and at ways to improve the way the kernel is
developed.
- The ioctl() interface,
dedicated to the proposition that this much-criticized system call is
not always evil.
- The kernel ABI, how to avoid breaking
it, and how to best maintain tools which are tightly coupled to the
kernel.
- Software suspend, what it will take to
make it work reliably, and whether user-space software suspend is a
good idea.
- Documentation: the current state of affairs and what can be done to improve it.
Day 2: July 18
The second and final day of the kernel summit included these sessions:
- Realtime: the state of
the realtime patches.
- Embedded systems and
what is required to better support them.
- Security; in particular,
the fate of AppArmor and the Linux Security Modules framework.
- Paravirtualization and containers and
how to make multiple virtualization solutions work in one kernel code
base.
- Automated testing: work
being done to catch kernel bugs before they affect users.
- The VFS layer.
- Scalability: how big can Linux go?
- DMA and IOMMU issues.
- Development process II; a final look at the process and the conclusion of the summit.
- The VFS layer.
In summary: in your editor's opinion, this was one of the more successful
kernel summits. The discussions were energetic and interesting, the topics
covered were relevant, and some real decisions were made. While there are
always improvements which can be made, it seems that the kernel process is
functioning well and the developers are, for the most part, working well
together. Things are going relatively smoothly, so the summit did as well.
| Index entries for this article | |
|---|---|
| Kernel | Kernel Summit |
| Conference | Kernel Summit/2006 |

![[Group photo]](https://static.lwn.net/images/conf/ols+ks2006/group-sm.jpg)