Idiom exclusion is really so important
Idiom exclusion is really so important
Posted Nov 13, 2024 11:20 UTC (Wed) by pm215 (subscriber, #98099)In reply to: Idiom exclusion is really so important by intelfx
Parent article: Progress on toolchain security features
You seemed to me to be proposing that until this suggestion of yours is implemented in compilers we should continue to open-code "if (x + y < x)". That open-coding is what I am describing as opaque.
Your idea is clearly nicer than the existing builtins, but we don't have it yet and in the best case won't have it widely available for years, so the question of what is most legible and least bug prone given current compiler facilities still matters, I think.
