|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Linux-for-Rust or Rust-for-Linux

Linux-for-Rust or Rust-for-Linux

Posted Sep 2, 2024 16:03 UTC (Mon) by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
In reply to: Linux-for-Rust or Rust-for-Linux by roc
Parent article: Rust-for-Linux developer Wedson Almeida Filho drops out

As I understood it (I never used them) the M68K chips had a sane design, unlike the x86 ones. Maybe the reason you can still buy them is people value them for their simplicity and "easy to understand"ness - that can be worth a lot.

Cheers,
Wol

to post comments

Linux-for-Rust or Rust-for-Linux

Posted Sep 2, 2024 19:12 UTC (Mon) by pbonzini (subscriber, #60935) [Link]

The current m68k chips (ColdFire) are a reduced and simplified version of the original instruction set. I doubt that a backwards compatible 680x0 with the addition of SIMD, 64-bit support, CFI, virtualization and whatnot (for example system-wide innovation such as multiprocessor and a fast superscalar microarchitecture) would be overall any more manageable than x86.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds