Linux-for-Rust or Rust-for-Linux
Linux-for-Rust or Rust-for-Linux
Posted Aug 30, 2024 17:55 UTC (Fri) by Wol (subscriber, #4433)In reply to: Linux-for-Rust or Rust-for-Linux by jgg
Parent article: Rust-for-Linux developer Wedson Almeida Filho drops out
> Your concern about inlines is news to me, that sounds kind of fatal honestly.
I was under the impression that - compiling huge monolithic blobs - Rust was quite capable of spotting and inlining functions like that all by itself. What's the point of an "inline" keyword if you can rely on the compiler to spot it?
(Dunno whether I like the downsides of huge blobs - it makes libraries more complicated - but it's horses for courses, or pick you poison, whichever suits ...)
Cheers,
Wol
