This is probably futile, but...
This is probably futile, but...
Posted May 9, 2024 23:32 UTC (Thu) by mattdm (subscriber, #18)Parent article: Another push for sched_ext
That situation _still_ may not make everyone happy, but it'd at least be nice if people were mad about the actual thing, rather than something very different.
If Red Hat makes improvements to the scheduler, via the mainline scheduler or BPF, they'll be shared back in a way that ultimately benefits everyone, and which emphasizes upstream collaboration -- _even if_ the BPF approach would technically allow us to not do so. (If this policy changes in the future, I'll go on record as saying that I'll be one of the people angry about it.)
Posted May 10, 2024 11:11 UTC (Fri)
by hkario (subscriber, #94864)
[Link] (3 responses)
(there are exceptions, of course, like security fixes, or unresponsive upstreams, etc. but the policy is still very much to get every patch shipped merged upstream)
disclaimer: I work at Red Hat
Posted May 10, 2024 11:24 UTC (Fri)
by sdalley (subscriber, #18550)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted May 11, 2024 16:51 UTC (Sat)
by mattdm (subscriber, #18)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted May 13, 2024 9:03 UTC (Mon)
by sdalley (subscriber, #18550)
[Link]
This is probably futile, but...
This is probably futile, but...
This is probably futile, but...
This is probably futile, but...
