Another push for sched

Another push for sched_ext

Posted May 9, 2024 18:30 UTC (Thu) by summentier (subscriber, #100638)
Parent article: Another push for sched_ext

> [Peter Zijlstra] said that he would not accept any part of this patch series until ""the cgroup situation"" has been resolved

I understand that it has been common practice to strongarm^Wencourage patch submitters into cleaning up about as much mildly related kernel code as they are willing to in order to get their patches merged.

This on the other hand seems to make just as much sense as the argument that Ukraine aid cannot be passed until the US-Mexican border is completely secure.

Or am I missing something here? Unfortunately, the maintainer does not really elaborate in his post ...

to post comments

Another push for sched_ext

Posted May 9, 2024 19:13 UTC (Thu) by summentier (subscriber, #100638) [Link] (2 responses)

Umm, okay.

I was trying to be funny there, but upon rereading this, I realized I was WAY out of line. This is the kernel, nobody's life is on the line. Apologies to Mr Zijlsta for drawing such a connection.

Unfortunately, there is no way to delete a comment. Granted, it would have been better to catch this before posting. Mr Corbet, feel free to delete this.

Another push for sched_ext

Posted May 12, 2024 14:48 UTC (Sun) by marcH (subscriber, #57642) [Link]

Ignoring the "out of line" analogy, this seems like a good question. Hopefully some people can see past the former and help answer the latter.

Another push for sched_ext

Posted May 28, 2024 2:44 UTC (Tue) by DanilaBerezin (guest, #168271) [Link]

Okay what happened here?