|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

A backdoor in xz

A backdoor in xz

Posted Mar 30, 2024 20:10 UTC (Sat) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239)
In reply to: A backdoor in xz by smurf
Parent article: A backdoor in xz

This is inaccurate. The backdoor code is checked in, and isn't able to modify the artifacts in itself. What isn't checked in is a backdoored m4 macro that injects code into configure, which in turn extracts further code from the test files and injects those into the build. It's kind of expected that configure is able to influence the build process, and compressor test files are inherently going to be binaries, so really the only red flag was the difference between the git repo and the tarball - a difference that's largely expected, given how autotools works.


to post comments

A backdoor in xz

Posted Mar 30, 2024 23:56 UTC (Sat) by chrisoofar (guest, #170494) [Link]

There is a lot of valid conversation around the viability of the autoconf build stack that should not be discounted, and it's time to put it to bed just like programmers left JCL job cards.

And if we're going to insist on a build tool with its own scripting language, then for the love of God and all that is holy pick or construct something that enforces readability with an iron fist.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds