Another round of speculative-execution vulnerabilities [LWN.net]

Another round of speculative-execution vulnerabilities

Posted Aug 23, 2023 5:28 UTC (Wed) by JosephBao91 (subscriber, #157211)
In reply to: Another round of speculative-execution vulnerabilities by malmedal
Parent article: Another round of speculative-execution vulnerabilities

Well, I think this statement is still not correct.
PCIe Gen5 is 32GT/s, with a frequency of 16GHz (tranfer data both posedge and negedge), and Gen6 uses PAM4 instead of NRZ, it transfers 2bits each time, and the frequency is still 16GHz, but the speed is 64GT/s.
And for hardware design, PAM4 16GHz is more difficulty compared with NRZ 16GHz.

to post comments

Another round of speculative-execution vulnerabilities

Posted Aug 23, 2023 11:34 UTC (Wed) by malmedal (subscriber, #56172) [Link] (2 responses)

Do you have a reference for this? I haven't read the actual specs myself, but all the articles I've read say 5.0 is 32GHz e.g. https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pcie-definition,5754...

Another round of speculative-execution vulnerabilities

Posted Aug 23, 2023 12:13 UTC (Wed) by excors (subscriber, #95769) [Link] (1 responses)

I think that may just be a different meaning of "frequency": the sampling rate is 32GHz, while the Nyquist frequency (basically the frequency of the sine wave corresponding to the worst-case signal 1010101...) is 16GHz. Same as describing audio CDs as 44kHz (the sampling rate) or 22kHz (the highest audio frequency that can be encoded without aliasing) - both are reasonable in different contexts.

For example https://blog.samtec.com/post/why-did-pcie-6-0-adopt-pam4-... describes the Nyquist frequency of PCIe 5.0/6.0 as 16GHz. (The sampling rate is also the same in both, the difference is that in 6.0 each sample encodes 2 bits, so it's 16GHz Nyquist frequency with 32GHz sampling rate and 64GT/s data rate.)

Another round of speculative-execution vulnerabilities

Posted Aug 23, 2023 13:14 UTC (Wed) by malmedal (subscriber, #56172) [Link]

Thank you, sounds plausible.