|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

CentOS was nearly dead when RH acquired it

CentOS was nearly dead when RH acquired it

Posted Jun 24, 2023 13:55 UTC (Sat) by pizza (subscriber, #46)
In reply to: CentOS was nearly dead when RH acquired it by nim-nim
Parent article: Kuhn: A Comprehensive Analysis of the GPL Issues With the Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Business Model

> But most Centos users had no intention to contribute anything but requests, as if software wrote qa-ed and packaged itself.

"It's work/valuable when I have to do the packaging/testing, but not when $someone_else has to do it."

I'm reminded of the parallels with arguments that it's too much work to package & qa things properly for $distro, so we should all use upstream-provided flatpaks/appimages/tarballs/whatever instead. So it's clearly a lot of work, even from the original software author's perspecive. And the end-user's too, which is why everyone wants RHEL, just at zero cost and effort.


to post comments

CentOS was nearly dead when RH acquired it

Posted Jun 26, 2023 6:26 UTC (Mon) by taladar (subscriber, #68407) [Link] (1 responses)

> which is why everyone wants RHEL

Not really. To be honest if I would never have anything to do with RHEL any more for the rest of my career as a sysadmin I would be happy. It is just so tiny in terms of number of packages and you have to jump through so many hoops to get something that works even half as well as Debian with RHEL.

CentOS was nearly dead when RH acquired it

Posted Jun 27, 2023 12:36 UTC (Tue) by TRauMa (guest, #16483) [Link]

Ugh, I thought I was the only one.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds