Python packaging targets [LWN.net]

Python packaging targets

Posted Mar 3, 2023 0:43 UTC (Fri) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
In reply to: Python packaging targets by nix
Parent article: Python packaging targets

> This is not rocket science. It's just a tricky compatibility and syntax thing.

Isn't this kind of the use case that this whole article series has been about though? It might not be rocket science, but it certainly doesn't seem easy. We (as a species) actually seem to be better at rocket science if you were to ask me…

Corner cases that come to mind:

- Two libraries provide metadata to describe their dependencies and they disagree about what version to use.
-- What is preferred?
-- Does every library/application need to specify their full transitive requirements?
- How do I prod random script developers to provide this information? Can it be specified in-source or is it sidecar metadata?
- If they are allowed to co-exist, what does `sys.modules` look like now?

to post comments

Python packaging targets

Posted Mar 3, 2023 13:30 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

> - Two libraries provide metadata to describe their dependencies and they disagree about what version to use.

I don't see how (in the absence of hermetic namespacing) this can be anything but a runtime error. Of course, again, other languages can do this easily...

> - How do I prod random script developers to provide this information? Can it be specified in-source or is it sidecar metadata?

I was assuming both: a file in the package directory versioning lots of things at once, or extra syntax for import. Sidecar seems totally wrong: this is something *the package* is expecting, not something the admin is supposed to be nailing down (how could the admin possibly know the right answer?)

Obviously if a given import doesn't have a version nailed in, the system works exactly as it does now: anything else would be a compatibility disaster. (Needless to say I have written none of this code so I'm totally bikeshedding and waving away all the no-doubt-horrible problems!)