Supporting deeper symbolic links
Supporting deeper symbolic links
Posted Jul 1, 2004 14:40 UTC (Thu) by jeremiah (subscriber, #1221)In reply to: Supporting deeper symbolic links by nathan
Parent article: Supporting deeper symbolic links
It does seem kinda strange, that the stack would grow at all. You only care about the start point and the end point, not the actual path you took to get there. Why wouldn't you just discard the most of the path as you went along?
