|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

The search for the correct amount of split-lock misery

The search for the correct amount of split-lock misery

Posted Oct 23, 2022 17:22 UTC (Sun) by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
In reply to: The search for the correct amount of split-lock misery by scientes
Parent article: The search for the correct amount of split-lock misery

> Considering the long history of silicon bugs around "transactional memory" which is basically atomic operations over a much larger amount of multiple cache lines

Silicon bugs asides, this "basically" sounds weird in a discussion about split lock performance. The concept of a transaction is exactly what provides atomicity over a larger set of data _without_ any extra performance cost. Transactions make performance independent from the data size.


to post comments


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds