The search for the correct amount of split-lock misery
The search for the correct amount of split-lock misery
Posted Oct 20, 2022 15:53 UTC (Thu) by WolfWings (subscriber, #56790)In reply to: The search for the correct amount of split-lock misery by kschendel
Parent article: The search for the correct amount of split-lock misery
In this case the mitigation is preventing impact to the rest of the system, which indeed is what "1" does. It directly penalizes anything that triggers split-cacheline-atomic scenarios by forcing it to eat a 10ms pause in it's next scheduling.
"0" disables the mitigation, allowing any single application to hog the bus for it's own locks and arbitrarily DDoS the rest of the system as a result.
