The future of NGINX
The future of NGINX
Posted Aug 26, 2022 6:24 UTC (Fri) by jamesh (guest, #1159)In reply to: The future of NGINX by LtWorf
Parent article: The future of NGINX
It's not an HTTP 1.1 vs HTTP 2 issue.
Posted Aug 26, 2022 7:31 UTC (Fri)
by wtarreau (subscriber, #51152)
[Link]
Posted Aug 26, 2022 14:46 UTC (Fri)
by LtWorf (subscriber, #124958)
[Link] (3 responses)
I'm saying if google wants to push http 4 they are in a position to do it and force everyone else to implement it.
Posted Aug 26, 2022 18:59 UTC (Fri)
by wtarreau (subscriber, #51152)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Aug 26, 2022 20:51 UTC (Fri)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link]
I've seen enough evil from airport and hotel "access points" that I really don't want them to muck with even `ytmnd.com` content. Forcing everything to at least *support* `https://` is a great boon IMO (forcing it via 304 redirects might be a bit much in some situations even if I do so for my own website).
Posted Aug 27, 2022 8:38 UTC (Sat)
by LtWorf (subscriber, #124958)
[Link]
The future of NGINX
The future of NGINX
The future of NGINX
The future of NGINX
The future of NGINX
