|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Posted Feb 20, 2022 17:13 UTC (Sun) by willy (subscriber, #9762)
In reply to: Thoughts on software-defined silicon by jhoblitt
Parent article: Thoughts on software-defined silicon

You're assuming that defects in L2/3 can only be worked around by disabling noticable chunks of the CPU. I don't know how Intel handles it, but I'd encourage you to read a paper from HP on how they handled it twenty years ago,

A 500 MHz 1.5 MB cache with on-chip CPU

(there are various free copies of the pdf floating around the net; you don't need to pay for it)

You probably also want to consider what percentage of the die is L3 cache; over 90% on the high end models with a hundred MB of L3 cache.


to post comments

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Posted Feb 21, 2022 4:54 UTC (Mon) by willy (subscriber, #9762) [Link]

Sorry, that design didn't feature the redundancy. That was added in the next generation,

https://parisc.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/File:Isscc_cache...

Slide 20 is where they start talking about the yield improvement features.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds