|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Posted Feb 19, 2022 15:10 UTC (Sat) by khim (subscriber, #9252)
In reply to: Thoughts on software-defined silicon by mfuzzey
Parent article: Thoughts on software-defined silicon

This would only work if you can, somehow, determine which combinations are actually safe and which may do harm based solely on some simple calculations.

If you need to do any kind of testing, then license would be perfect way to ensure that everything works perfectly.

That's minor issue, ultimately. Economic need to differentiate markets drives the effort to a much larger degree than technical needs.


to post comments

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Posted Feb 20, 2022 10:20 UTC (Sun) by NYKevin (subscriber, #129325) [Link] (1 responses)

Meh, from a technical perspective, there's no reason the licenses have to be sold individually. You could instead publish one set of "licenses" that everyone is allowed to download and copy freely, but they're all signed so you can't modify them. Maybe you also publish a separate signing key that allows users to make their own private "licenses" with untested combinations of features, with the proviso that "this might brick your hardware, don't ask for your money back if it does." Regardless of the specifics, an "open" version of this sort of thing could exist, if Intel wanted to make it.

The point is, you can decouple the technical aspect from the economic aspect, at least to some extent. Locked hardware exists because it is economically favored for it to exist. You can't "solve" the "problem" of locked hardware; it is not a technical problem in the first place. As long as those economic incentives continue to exist, it is inevitable that Intel, and other chip manufacturers, will produce and sell locked hardware.

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Posted Feb 20, 2022 12:00 UTC (Sun) by khim (subscriber, #9252) [Link]

> You can't "solve" the "problem" of locked hardware; it is not a technical problem in the first place.

Yes, but you can go in the other direction: use solution designed to solve economic problem to solve technical problem, too.

> As long as those economic incentives continue to exist, it is inevitable that Intel, and other chip manufacturers, will produce and sell locked hardware.

True, but they would use technical need to keep hardware from breaking as justification for what they are doing.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds