Thoughts on software-defined silicon
Thoughts on software-defined silicon
Posted Feb 19, 2022 15:06 UTC (Sat) by mfuzzey (subscriber, #57966)In reply to: Thoughts on software-defined silicon by khim
Parent article: Thoughts on software-defined silicon
>enable features without license would become actively harmful: enabling all features simultaneously would just fry the chip and it would be pretty hard to prove in warranty service that this happened because of customer irresponsibility, not because of customer's misuse.
Surely this case could be handled in hardware by only accepting configurations enabling at most any 2 of features A, B, C (or whatever other thermal / power constraints exist). I don't see why this would require a license based system to be safe
The LWN site is currently under high scraper load, so comment display has been suppressed for anonymous users. If you are a human, you may read the comments by clicking the button below:
Note: you can avoid this step in the future by logging into your LWN account.
