Thoughts on software-defined silicon
Thoughts on software-defined silicon
Posted Feb 19, 2022 13:37 UTC (Sat) by nim-nim (subscriber, #34454)In reply to: Thoughts on software-defined silicon by jebba
Parent article: Thoughts on software-defined silicon
No chance of Red Hat refusing to do it now they belong to IBM, who already practices this.
And even if everyone in the community refused to add it Intel would just add the patch to its own kernel and require use of this kernel. Like Nvidia does for its own hardware.
Free software means adding antifeatures to a fork is cheap (especially if they are self-contained).
The LWN site is currently under high scraper load, so comment display has been suppressed for anonymous users. If you are a human, you may read the comments by clicking the button below:
Note: you can avoid this step in the future by logging into your LWN account.
