|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Posted Feb 19, 2022 11:41 UTC (Sat) by smurf (subscriber, #17840)
In reply to: Thoughts on software-defined silicon by Wol
Parent article: Thoughts on software-defined silicon

That makes economic sense when the silicon is broken, and already routinely used with clock speeds or (in the embedded realm) on-die Flash memory.

Selling perfectly working CPUs at a bargain and then charge for the "upgrade" is a slightly different kettle of fish, and frankly I can't contribute much to that discussion beyond "don't like it and will go to some pains not to use CPUs with this kind of anti-feature".

The non-turnoff-able IME is bad enough.


The LWN site is currently under high scraper load, so comment display has been suppressed for anonymous users. If you are a human, you may read the comments by clicking the button below:

Note: you can avoid this step in the future by logging into your LWN account.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds