|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Posted Feb 19, 2022 3:40 UTC (Sat) by k8to (guest, #15413)
Parent article: Thoughts on software-defined silicon

I feel like the natural consequence of "let's put software in everything" is that everything will be full of bugs and security problems.

I'm not really a fan of rentier models, but I think the technical problems that will come are enough to make this a bad idea.

Sure there are examples of doing this in the mainframe era, but mainframes were not living in our modern world of security attacks. Additionally, the pricetags and dev cycles of those systems meant that a lot more attention was given to the implementations at least in an attention / complexity ratio sense.


to post comments

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Posted Feb 21, 2022 9:34 UTC (Mon) by taladar (subscriber, #68407) [Link]

You should read the article. It is not about actual software defined hardware, just about enabling features in hardware with licenses.

Also, do you really think people somehow make fewer mistakes just because they are designing hardware instead of writing software?


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds