Rust and GCC, two different ways
Rust and GCC, two different ways
Posted Oct 5, 2021 1:12 UTC (Tue) by willy (subscriber, #9762)In reply to: Rust and GCC, two different ways by roc
Parent article: Rust and GCC, two different ways
I'd argue the front end (everything from calling read() on the .cpp file to generating IR) is the important bit for "being a C++ compiler". IR to assembly/binary is code generation and essentially language independent.
So if a compiler uses g++ as its front end and does magic stuff afterwards, fine, let's dismiss it, but there are some compilers in this list being lumped together because they use the same back end, and I think that's bad logic. eg EDG should count, even though it doesn't do code gen.
