Why RISC-V doesn't (yet) support KVM [LWN.net]

Why RISC-V doesn't (yet) support KVM

Posted May 21, 2021 10:54 UTC (Fri) by khim (subscriber, #9252)
In reply to: Why RISC-V doesn't (yet) support KVM by ncm
Parent article: Why RISC-V doesn't (yet) support KVM

> Are kernel maintainers prepared to support more than one version of RISC-V virtualization?

Why would that be a problem? AMD and Intel use totally different schemes and they both are supported.

And I think being implemented in ASIC which is shipping should be considered “effectively frozen”. I can see how people may implement thousands of different things on FPGA. Supporting these would be a nightmare from practical POV. And FPGA implementation can definitely be changed thus it's not “effectively frozen” anyway. But if something is already in ASIC it couldn't ever be changed (on that specific ASIC) thus I think kernel should support it.

Kernel supports lots of devices (WiFi and others) which only support draft of some spec or another… why RISC-V extensions should be different?

to post comments

Why RISC-V doesn't (yet) support KVM

Posted May 21, 2021 15:11 UTC (Fri) by mss (subscriber, #138799) [Link] (2 responses)

> Why would that be a problem? AMD and Intel use totally different schemes and they both are supported.

It's a waste of effort to implement what's effectively the same thing two different ways.
And these aren't trivial things.

Why RISC-V doesn't (yet) support KVM

Posted May 23, 2021 7:38 UTC (Sun) by ssmith32 (subscriber, #72404) [Link] (1 responses)

It's not a waste of effort for the people who are stuck with one implementation or the other: in short, the users of linux. Particularly when that implementation is baked into asic hardware.

Why RISC-V doesn't (yet) support KVM

Posted May 23, 2021 11:57 UTC (Sun) by mss (subscriber, #138799) [Link]

My comment was more about not having two different hardware schemes in the first place (like VMX and SVM for x86).