|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

The future of 32-bit Linux

The future of 32-bit Linux

Posted Dec 11, 2020 11:50 UTC (Fri) by winden (subscriber, #60389)
In reply to: The future of 32-bit Linux by glaubitz
Parent article: The future of 32-bit Linux

Are you aware of anyone running / fixing m68k Debian for vampire boards? They are getting fairly high performance (at least 4x of a 060/50 for cpu intensive work) and it seems to me that they are being well-enough engineered.

Ps. Thankyou for latest information about m68k and how to get a fully-working Debian chroot / nspwand ... it works great! :)


to post comments

The future of 32-bit Linux

Posted Dec 11, 2020 11:57 UTC (Fri) by glaubitz (subscriber, #96452) [Link]

> Are you aware of anyone running / fixing m68k Debian for vampire boards? They are
> getting fairly high performance (at least 4x of a 060/50 for cpu intensive work) and it
> seems to me that they are being well-enough engineered.

I know about the Vampire boards and I talked to one of the developers at the Amiga32
conference in Neuss, Germany.

The problem is that Vampire currently does not emulate an MMU that is compatible with
the Linux/m68k kernel. However, the FPGA they are using has its own MMU and the
Vampire developers speculated whether it could be used by the Linux kernel instead.

> Ps. Thankyou for latest information about m68k and how to get a fully-working Debian
> chroot / nspwand ... it works great! :)

You're welcome. Please also have a look at http://m68k.info which brings news about new
development in the m68k community. You will find a talk about the upcoming M68k backend
for LLVM as well as a new qemu virtual machine type for m68k with 3.2 GB RAM and 128
virtual devices.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds