|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Fixing our broken internet

By Jake Edge
October 7, 2020

In unusually stark terms, Mozilla is trying to rally the troops to take back the internet from the forces of evil—or at least "misinformation, corruption and greed"—that have overtaken it. In a September 30 blog post, the organization behind the Firefox web browser warned that "the internet needs our love". While there is lots to celebrate about the internet, it is increasingly under threat from various types of bad actors, so Mozilla is starting a campaign to try to push back against those threats.

The effort is, to a certain extent, an attempt to raise the profile of Firefox, which does generally have a better track record on respecting privacy than its competitors. That should not come as a huge surprise since the other major browsers come from companies that stand to profit from surveillance capitalism. The Mozilla Foundation, on the other hand, is a non-profit organization that is guided by a pro-privacy manifesto. But beyond just pushing its browser, Mozilla is looking to try to fundamentally change things:

And in recent years we’ve seen those with power — Big Tech, governments, and bad actors — become more dominant, more brazen, and more dangerous. That’s a shame, because there’s still a lot to celebrate and do online. Whether it’s enjoying the absurd — long live cat videos — or addressing the downright critical, like beating back a global pandemic, we all need an internet where people, not profits, come first.

So it’s time to sound the alarm.

The internet we know and love is fcked up.

That is some of the background behind the "Unfck the Internet" campaign. The blog post gets more specific about exactly what kinds of abuses are being targeted:

Let’s take back control from those who violate our privacy just to sell us stuff we don’t need. Let’s work to stop companies like Facebook and YouTube from contributing to the disastrous spread of misinformation and political manipulation. It’s time to take control over what we do and see online, and not let the algorithms feed us whatever they want.

The plan consists of "five concrete and shareable ways to reclaim what’s good about life online by clearing out the bad", much of which revolves around Firefox add-ons that are intended to help combat some of the abuses. For example, Facebook and others target ads at particular groups, so that it is hard for researchers to get a full view of all of the different ads being served. It is difficult to determine what abuses are being perpetrated in these ads if they cannot be seen. So the Ad Observer add-on collects the ads that are seen on Facebook and YouTube to share with them with the Online Political Transparency project at NYU.

Another entry revolves around the recent documentary The Social Dilemma, which, somewhat ironically, comes from Netflix. It is a much-talked-about look at the problems inherent in social media and our reliance upon it. The campaign is suggesting that people watch the movie and share it with their friends, but also that they take action to realign social media and their use of it. Beyond that, there is a suggested reading list to dig further into the topic of social media and its effects on society.

Two other Firefox add-ons are suggested. Facebook Container is meant to make it harder for Facebook to track users across the web by making use of Firefox Multi-Account Containers. The idea is that interaction with a site is done only in a color-coded tab that doesn't share identity information (and cookies) with other containers. Facebook Container ensures that links from Facebook pages are followed in a separate container so that Facebook cannot track the user; using Facebook "Share" buttons outside of the container will route them through the container as well.

Unfck the Internet also recommends the RegretsReporter extension to report on YouTube videos that were recommended but turned out to be objectionable. The idea is to try to crowdsource enough information about the YouTube recommendation system to better understand it—and the AI behind it.

The RegretsReporter extension gives you a way to report YouTube Regrets—videos that YouTube has recommended to you that you end up wishing you had never watched. This extension is part of a crowdsourced data campaign to learn more about what people regret watching, and how it was recommended to them. [...]

Insights from the RegretsReporter extension will be used in Mozilla Foundation's advocacy and campaigning work to hold YouTube and other companies accountable for the AI developed to power their recommendation systems. These insights will be shared with journalists working to investigate these problems and technologists working to build more trustworthy AI.

As might be guessed, there are some serious privacy implications from these add-ons, RegretsReporter in particular. Mozilla is clearly conscious of that; it specifically describes which data it is collecting and how users' privacy will be protected in the description of the add-on. The company has generally been seen as a beacon of pro-privacy actions over the years, but it did have a prominent stumble in late 2017 when it installed an add-on ("Looking Glass") without user consent. The privacy implications of that were probably not large, in truth, but the action certainly gave off a bad smell, which was acknowledged by Mozilla in a retrospective analysis of "Looking Glass". That the add-on was a tie-in to a television show, thus presumably done for monetary gain, only made things worse.

The final recommendation is to use more of what it calls "independent tech", which are products and projects that, like Firefox, are focused on protecting the privacy and security of their users. It lists a small handful of companies, Jumbo, Signal, Medium, ProtonMail, and Mozilla's own Pocket, that embody the attributes that Unfck the Internet would like to see:

Luckily, we aren't the only ones who believe that the internet works best when your privacy and security are protected. There are a number of us out there pushing for an internet that is powered by more than a handful of large tech companies, because we believe the more choice you have the better things are for you — and for the web. We vetted these companies for how they treat your data and for their potential to shake things up. In short: they’re solid.

Together, we have power. We all win when everyone supports indie tech. Here are just a few of the smaller, independent players whose services we think you should be using. If you help them, you help yourself. So go ahead and join the anti-establishment.

The intent, it would seem, is for this announcement to be a starting point. More recommendations and ideas will be forthcoming from the project down the road. Getting the word out more widely is another focus of effort, of course, so those interested are encouraged to spread the word—presumably via social media, ironically. The time is ripe: "It’s time to unfck the internet. For our kids, for society, for the climate. For the cats."

The problems being addressed are real enough, for sure; it would be great to see a grass-roots effort make some serious headway in solving them. Whether or not that is truly realistic is perhaps questionable, but it is hard to see other plausible ways to combat the problems. We humans have made this trap for ourselves by consistently choosing convenience and gratis over other, possibly more important, values. Companies that stand to gain from all of these problems are going to be fighting tooth and nail to retain their positions and prerogatives, so they can increase their profits, thus their shareholder value. Until and unless humanity, as a whole, wises up, things probably will not change all that much. In the meantime, though, we can find ways to better protect our own privacy and security—and help our friends, family, and neighbors do the same.



to post comments

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 8, 2020 0:51 UTC (Thu) by frispete (subscriber, #89956) [Link] (2 responses)

I would like to share this article with some of my colleagues and family, but they are not subscribers.
To live up to the spirit of the article, you might want to reconsider the $ for this particular case.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 8, 2020 0:56 UTC (Thu) by am (subscriber, #69042) [Link]

At the bottom of each paid LWN article, there's a "Send a free link" button specifically for that purpose.

https://lwn.net/op/FAQ.lwn#slinks

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 8, 2020 1:29 UTC (Thu) by himi (subscriber, #340) [Link]

Aside from the free link feature, it's also worth noting that all LWN content becomes free a week after it goes into the weekly update - while this may well be a timely article, it's not going to age much in a week.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 8, 2020 6:43 UTC (Thu) by mkubecek (guest, #130791) [Link]

Internet? Sounds more like web - and only specific part of it.

Not that Internet wouldn't also deserve some "unfcking". But that would be a completely different topic.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 8, 2020 9:30 UTC (Thu) by LtWorf (subscriber, #124958) [Link]

On facebook, continuously, a few weeks ago, for multiple weeks, I'd get suggestions to join pro donald trump/ivanka trump groups. They were supposedly not paid ads, just group suggestions based of my preferences of being a leftist who doesn't live in USA.

I also once got an ad for prostitutes on fb, but that got removed almost immediately and I only saw it once.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 8, 2020 10:26 UTC (Thu) by jlicht (subscriber, #112477) [Link] (6 responses)

How does pocket embody any of these qualities? Has it finally been made open source, as promised years ago?

Calling medium a paragon of "unbreaking the internet" is not even funny; it is one of the most annoying pages to visit with their pop-ups.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 8, 2020 13:40 UTC (Thu) by MattBBaker (guest, #28651) [Link] (4 responses)

I've only seen Pocket as unwelcome crapware. Everyone else I talk to feels the same. I try disabling it but any update re-enables it. Been looking for browser alternatives.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 8, 2020 15:59 UTC (Thu) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link]

I've not seen Pocket in anything other than my "nothing done to it" profile I use to test whether it's my suite of extensions causing problems or not. Maybe I did an `about:config` change, but I don't remember it at least.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 9, 2020 20:13 UTC (Fri) by NightMonkey (subscriber, #23051) [Link] (2 responses)

I actually only started using Pocket when I recently purchased a Kobo Forma eReader (which bundles Pocket), so I could read Web-based articles on it 'offline'. For that purpose, it's not so bad. :) I don't use Firefox (Chromium/Chrome), so perhaps I have just missed some badly-done integration there?

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 9, 2020 20:49 UTC (Fri) by dtlin (subscriber, #36537) [Link] (1 responses)

Yes, it sounds like you missed this controversy: https://lwn.net/Articles/650869/

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 9, 2020 23:03 UTC (Fri) by NightMonkey (subscriber, #23051) [Link]

Ah. Wow. Yes, that was a badly done integration. Thank you.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 15, 2020 9:14 UTC (Thu) by jrigg (guest, #30848) [Link]

> Calling medium a paragon of "unbreaking the internet" is not even funny; it is one of the most annoying pages to visit with their pop-ups.

It works without popups in Firefox with NoScript; it's also readable in JS-less browsers like Dillo.

I only enable JavaScript if there's a specific need for it, eg. online banking and shopping sites. Most of the web would be intolerable otherwise.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 8, 2020 13:39 UTC (Thu) by mcatanzaro (subscriber, #93033) [Link]

> That should not come as a huge surprise since the other major browsers come from companies that stand to profit from surveillance capitalism.

WebKit's stance (which applies to Safari, the world's second most-popular web browser): https://webkit.org/tracking-prevention-policy

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 8, 2020 14:02 UTC (Thu) by hubcapsc (subscriber, #98078) [Link]

I use firefox, privacy badger and have never had a
facebook account. I just went to youtube and scrolled
through a few pages. You don't seem to be able to get
to "the bottom", more just keeps coming :-) ... Anywho...
besides a few ads and a couple of lines that everybody
probably gets (?) "breaking news" and "latest youtube posts",
everything was stuff I'd like to look at... people playing
guitars, John Wayne and Gunsmoke and Breaking Bad,
motorcycles... I don't know why there was one of a sheep jumping
on a trampoline and then there seemed to be one of
some naked person running track, I didn't look at it, maybe
a motorcycle was chasing her?

I saw a link on my motorcycle forum (no facebook, but I
do look at a motorcycle forum and an acoustic guitar forum
and a truck forum, the old fashioned forums remind me of usenet
groups) to the Hodge Twins, and I thought they were funny, so I
looked at a couple more. Youtube started recommending
their videos to me. It wasn't long before I realized they were
repetitive and profane, so I quit looking and youtube noticed
and quit recommending them.

So... I'm not foo-fooing the idea that the Internet is
kind of broken, but I like the recommendations I get by
youtube's tracking of what I look at. I picked Billy Strings
and Steely Dan and they recommended Reina del Cid.
I don't know why I'd have ever looked at one of her videos
otherwise...

-Mike

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 8, 2020 14:31 UTC (Thu) by kleptog (subscriber, #1183) [Link] (4 responses)

No mention of the government, or is that a dirty word in this context? While I admire the idea of us individual consumers who care about this installing some extensions to collect more data and tweeting about it, real change is only going to happen when these huge companies are simply forced to change.

Child labour wasn't abolished because people grew a conscience, it was because the government said children should go to school and enforced it. The big companies didn't start giving you insight into the data they have on you because they woke up one morning and figured it'd be a neat idea.

There must be a strategy here, but I'm not seeing it.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 8, 2020 17:43 UTC (Thu) by ecree (guest, #95790) [Link] (1 responses)

> Child labour wasn't abolished because people grew a conscience, it was because the government said children should go to school and enforced it.

That's historically inaccurate. Legislating against child labour only became politically possible once it had already become rare for economic reasons.

Similarly, if given the power to regulate the web, governments will use it to benefit their cronies, not the people.

So while a perfect unincentivised philosopher-king might be able to enforce the changes you desire, 'real existing government' won't.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 9, 2020 7:52 UTC (Fri) by nilsmeyer (guest, #122604) [Link]

> That's historically inaccurate. Legislating against child labour only became politically possible once it had already become rare for economic reasons.

Also children who acquired disabilities from factory labor didn't make for good soldiers when conscripted...

> Similarly, if given the power to regulate the web, governments will use it to benefit their cronies, not the people.

The cynic in me would agree. If Facebook or Google were European companies we probably wouldn't have as stringent privacy laws.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 10, 2020 9:17 UTC (Sat) by ibukanov (subscriber, #3942) [Link]

In 1950s much more children in Africa went to school than in Taiwan or South Korea. In fact there is no data that show that stopping child labor helps wellbeing of people in the country long-term.

What happens historically is that when a country became prosperous, it became affordable for society to pay for schools as a form of day-care for children.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 11, 2020 13:04 UTC (Sun) by flussence (guest, #85566) [Link]

>Child labour wasn't abolished because people grew a conscience, it was because the government said children should go to school and enforced it.

The version I've heard is that institutionalised education was actually a huge hit with the industrial capitalism of the early 20th century, because it delivers a housebroken workforce with homogeneous baseline ability for no extra cost to the boss, driving down workers' bargaining power and massively increasing profits. Can't have interchangeable cogs without first building the machine.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 9, 2020 8:49 UTC (Fri) by nilsmeyer (guest, #122604) [Link] (2 responses)

Maybe Mozilla should focus on unfcking the Mozilla Foundation first. The pay the chair receives is inversely correlated to the browser market share. They are getting rid of developers while having an enormous administrative overhead. Instead of focusing on failing side projects they should focus on making a better browser.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 10, 2020 16:01 UTC (Sat) by busman (subscriber, #7333) [Link] (1 responses)

They can't win Google. Mozilla once won IE but that was more because Microsoft didn't understand what was going on and gave Mozilla years that were badly needed to stabilize their browser. Google will not make that mistake. Net is *their* platform and they will throw as many person-hours on it as needed to keep it that way. This Mozilla campaign is an effort to cling on to at least some portion of their former user base.

I don't see any major shifts coming out of it but maybe we should see this bunch of independent smallish companies as proto-mammals of dinosaur era. Maybe the asteroid comes or maybe it doesn't but at least they are there trying to cease the moment if it ever does happen :)

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 10, 2020 19:31 UTC (Sat) by needs (guest, #98089) [Link]

I'm not so sure about Google being able to outperform Mozilla regarding tech and web standard implementation. There is actually the workforce and the money for Mozilla to follow web evolution. That's not IMO the issue at play.

The issue is that Mozilla income comes from Google.

The next big move for a browser is to ship with a built-in ad blocker. That's a move Chrome will have a hard time to deal with. However as long as Mozilla is tied to Google it will never happen and Google will win.

Of course Firefox mobile will not be able to ship because Google also controls Android, but at least it will pave the way for a very interesting lawsuit. I can't see any other way for Mozilla to eventually fight for a better web.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 10, 2020 18:24 UTC (Sat) by amarao (guest, #87073) [Link] (2 responses)

They said one thing and done opposit. Recent version broke umatrix plugin, and internet without umatrix is like walking the street with unzipped pants. Too much visible and it's a shame.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 29, 2020 8:32 UTC (Thu) by daenzer (subscriber, #7050) [Link] (1 responses)

I'm writing this on current Firefox 82 with uMatrix 1.4.0, which works fine, so I'm not sure what you're talking about.

Firefox for Android

Posted Oct 29, 2020 9:31 UTC (Thu) by james (subscriber, #1325) [Link]

Firefox has recently released a massively reworked version of Firefox for Android with support for only a few plugins. uMatrix isn't one of them.

The old Firefox for Android is no longer receiving security updates, effectively killing it.

Also, uMatrix's developer has stopped updating it, which is a great shame.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 11, 2020 8:20 UTC (Sun) by rzaa (guest, #130641) [Link] (4 responses)

> protecting the privacy and security of their users
> ProtoMail

Is this a joke?
I cannot register a mailbox without a phone number, and also registration does not work through the Tor service.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 11, 2020 22:55 UTC (Sun) by nrdxp (guest, #142443) [Link] (3 responses)

I’ve never given them my phone number and have had an account since first release...

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 22, 2020 2:16 UTC (Thu) by landley (guest, #6789) [Link] (2 responses)

A lot of places used to let you register an account without a phone number, and services that now require it for all new accounts (like twitter and gmail) have grandfathered in accounts that don't YET have a phone number, until the first hiccup where it puts up a modal "add a phone number to your account" dialog you can't exit from every time you try to use the service, and then your account is bricked unless you comply.

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 26, 2020 9:51 UTC (Mon) by rzaa (guest, #130641) [Link] (1 responses)

For google you can easily create new acc without number, but for this you will need one phone device (in may case it was old Samsung).

1. Factory reset
2. Create new google acc
3. Chose "I don't have phone number"
4. You have one acc
5. Goto 1 to create new acc

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Nov 17, 2020 21:10 UTC (Tue) by bostjan (guest, #118664) [Link]

AFAIK, this only works in certain countries (IIRC in Slovenia the phone number is mandatory, unlike in Germany where it isn't).

Fixing our broken internet

Posted Oct 11, 2020 12:29 UTC (Sun) by flussence (guest, #85566) [Link]

Nah.

I really can't trust this version of Mozilla, under its current leadership, beyond providing a basic web browser application (one which I note now has an entire cottage industry dedicated to thoroughly neutering it, so that it doesn't phone home a hundred different ways, advertise junkware like a worm-infested windows box, and drop little executable DRM turds in your home directory). I'm resigned to waiting for the company to collapse, and at best see the codebase picked up by someone that actually “gives a fck” about the web.

And I say that as someone who participated in all the “Spread Firefox” grassroots marketing mania back in the day. It's not at all the same company it started out as; there's no soul or community left, only greed, the smug ingratiating narcissism of Silicon Valley PHBs, and a never-ending torrent of these obliviously ironic, cringingly out of touch, rich-US-liberal feel-good shapes-and-colours infographics campaigns talking down to users in the same way corporations that can afford to take that tone do.

Sorry Mozilla, but it's *our* internet. Not *yours*. We tried Taking Back The Web™ on your behalf once already, and you dutifully took our efforts in beating Microsoft back off the field and surrendered it to Google one principle at a time, all while sneering that *you* weren't going to die on each hill but *we* weren't doing enough for the Open Web. If you want fixing then bring out the corporate suits and the marketdroids and we'll bring a bus to throw them under. A large slice of the population in 2020 wouldn't even consider that a metaphor.

Or in terms that perhaps their campaign manager can speak - TL;DR: NYPA, STFU.

Facebook demands takedown of AdObserver

Posted Oct 25, 2020 4:17 UTC (Sun) by alison (subscriber, #63752) [Link]

https://www.sfchronicle.com/news/article/Facebook-demands...

"The company has long claimed protecting user privacy is its main concern, though NYU researchers say their tool is programmed so the data collected from participating volunteers is anonymous."


Copyright © 2020, Eklektix, Inc.
This article may be redistributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY-SA 4.0 license
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds