|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Toward a "modern" Emacs

Toward a "modern" Emacs

Posted Sep 27, 2020 6:33 UTC (Sun) by NYKevin (subscriber, #129325)
In reply to: Toward a "modern" Emacs by Cyberax
Parent article: Toward a "modern" Emacs

The problem with the word "bad" is that it's ridiculously subjective. Canonical is, to the best of my knowledge, still shipping ZFS binaries, which may or may not be a GPL violation depending on which group of lawyers you ask (e.g. the SFC and the SFLC disagree), and as far as I can tell, nobody has sued them or expressed any interest in doing so. We may never get a legal resolution to this case, and we may never know whether this is a violation or not.

Is Canonical a "bad actor" within your definition?


to post comments

Toward a "modern" Emacs

Posted Sep 27, 2020 6:38 UTC (Sun) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]

Canonical is not a bad actor. A smart device manufacturer that doesn't supply the kernel source is one of them.

A couple of jobs before, we had a NAS appliance that ran a copy of Linux with special RAID drivers and device management drivers (cooling, temperature sensors). Without any source code provided. This is another example of a bad vendor.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds