|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Toward a "modern" Emacs

Toward a "modern" Emacs

Posted Sep 25, 2020 23:55 UTC (Fri) by NYKevin (subscriber, #129325)
In reply to: Toward a "modern" Emacs by IanKelling
Parent article: Toward a "modern" Emacs

> US nonprofits can't be bought, they are bound by law to follow their mission, and FSF is ultimately run by by a volunteer board who would never stray from that mission.

You missed the word "bankruptcy." If they go bankrupt, they may have no choice in the matter. This is precisely what happened to Sun.

> And there is a barrier to pulling your code: enforcing copyright when you don't own the copyright is significantly harder.

If I would agree with the upstream's enforcement action, then they can ask me to sign onto it at the time it actually happens. If I would not agree, then I see no reason to give them permission in advance. Regardless, they have the legal right to use the code. From my perspective, their personal preferences regarding how a purely hypothetical enforcement action would proceed are not my problem.

> Give me a break. Here's a related link.

Your link does not appear to be relevant to my argument, but instead merely states a preference to avoid the use of a specific term because it carries certain connotations, connotations which my argument does not depend on and which are entirely unrelated to this discussion. Since it is not relevant, I am ignoring it entirely.


to post comments

Toward a "modern" Emacs

Posted Sep 26, 2020 0:27 UTC (Sat) by mohg (guest, #114025) [Link]

The issue of bankruptcy has been previously addressed at eg
https://lwn.net/Articles/582472/


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds