The rapid growth of io_uring
The rapid growth of io_uring
Posted May 25, 2020 22:31 UTC (Mon) by rand0m$tring (guest, #125230)In reply to: The rapid growth of io_uring by dcoutts
Parent article: The rapid growth of io_uring
right so this is obviously a huge problem, it makes anything more than a toy server impossible. I don't understand the reasoning for this limitation?
A buffer per operation is also a nonstarter for the same reason. In 5.7 IOSQE_BUFFER_SELECT attempts to solve the buffer problem with rotations. But I think an input / output ring buffer solution that allows allocation at the tail when needed, and just returns ranges into the input or output buffer makes more sense?
