|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Bringing encryption restrictions in through the back door

Bringing encryption restrictions in through the back door

Posted Mar 18, 2020 20:50 UTC (Wed) by pizza (subscriber, #46)
In reply to: Bringing encryption restrictions in through the back door by nybble41
Parent article: Bringing encryption restrictions in through the back door

The problem with your reasoned response is that the rebuttal is simply "<Politician X> sided with special interests against giving law enforcement the tools to protect your children from predators. But I will be be tough on crime, vote for me!"

(And it just goes downhill from there..)


to post comments

Bringing encryption restrictions in through the back door

Posted Mar 19, 2020 10:45 UTC (Thu) by ale2018 (subscriber, #128727) [Link]

Correct. Who would dare to uphold CSAM now? Bigotry is anathema to freedom in the same sense.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that there are cases where child sexual abuse is welcome. I'm saying that to overreact to any whisper about such subject undermines tolerance an civic sense.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds